Tea Party, Nazi Party and ISIS … is there a difference?

Are we going to repeat 1929?  And 1933?  Then repeat 1939 and 1944/45? 

Or is America going to set aside the idea of WMD’s and spending more on military murder machines that the next seven highest military spending nations combine?

Self defense is one thing, murdering elected leaders and instituting destructive “regime change” for short term corporate profits is another.

Look at the HAND … Hitler held down, Cruz Stops … Cruz says “It’s Bad” but never gives any reason, and certainly never provides anything which can be “fact checked.” 

In 2013, Cruz stopped Government by reading Dr. Seuss into the Senate Congressional Record – seems that’s all the Republican Senate is good for … reading Children’s Stories.

Cruz, a Natural Born Canadian – whose Cuban father loved America so much, he chose to become a Canadian Citizen until his son decided to use POTUS as a means of defrauding Campaign Donors – is in the process of asserting the Constitutional eligibility clause null and void.  But that’s OK – Donald Trump said, he would negate Freedom of Religion and the Establishment Clause, by closing all Mosques.

Didn’t Nazis do that with the Synagogues?  But Trump is pandering to the New American Nazi Party – called the Tea Party – so naturally he would be an advocate of their policy objectives.

ISIS KNOWS, it need only kill a handful of people (ten percent of the number that American police have killed in the first ten months of 2015 alone), and that is all its Tea Party buddies need to justify murdering tens of thousands of innocent Muslims Women and Children.

"The Tea Party: America Upended"

"President Ted Cruz: The 2016 Election and America's Future"

"Death Over Life: Secret of Revelation: A Prophecy of America's Destruction"

The Hebrew Bible tells the story of Solomon discovering that what he thought was correct behavior to honor God was actually wrong – from that was derived the RULE OF SOLOMON:

You sin,

when you are told your actions are wrong

and you still do them.

You’ve been told.

America needs to be allied with Shiites

This is the reality of Middle East Terrorists -- they are NOT Islamic; they are not Muslims; they are people who MURDER Muslims.
"Quadruple suicide bombers on Friday hit a pair of mosques controlled by Shiite rebels in the Yemeni capital, Sanaa, on Friday, unleashing blasts through crowds of worshippers that killed at least 137 people and wounded around 350 others in the deadliest violence to hit the fragile war-torn nation in decades."
It is time for the media to get real and understand what is going on.  These are Middle Eastern revisions of those who promote THE MOST HARM TO MOST PEOPLE Right-wing Republican agenda which promotes Hardship and Death over Life.
In America the Republican equivalent of ISIS appropriated $605 Billion a year for a military which cannot even keep kids from crossing the border illegally -- if kids can get in in groups of tens to hundreds, terrorists with nukes can get in a lot easier. 
The "fiscally conservative Republicans are wasting money -- or they are achieving their real goal ... to create a force for mass slaughter which is awaiting an opportunity.  If the latter, watch for them to increasingly bemoan Obama removing troops for the terrorist lands.
Also, their hatred for the Shiites infers that the Shiites are the natural allies for thiose who wish to end terrorism.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/03/20/suicide-bombings-sanaa_n_6908792.html?ir=World&utm_campaign=032015&utm_medium=email&utm_source=Alert-world&utm_content=FullStory&ncid=newsltushpmg00000003

"Death Over Life: Secret of Revelation: A Prophecy of America's Destruction" – America, Washington, Babylon the great city, will fall in 2015/16 – because the Republicans want to assist the Terrorists, by undermining POTUS and the economy.

What the Tea Party Opposes

Prosthetics are costly and there is one thing which has been made perfectly clear from all anti-Obamacare, anti-public assistance rhetoric:  The Republicans hate the idea that this little girl received, and has mastered, her prosthetics.

These things require  both a program of physical therapy and surgeries to ensure that they are functioning properly and the recipient can utilize them.  Somebody paid for that – private insurance?  The stuff mandated by Obamacare, and which cannot, because of the clause in Obamacare, be denied her in the future under the guise of a “pre-existing condition.”

Ted Cruz would see this little girl denied health insurance as she gets older and is removed from her parent’s coverage.

Ted Cruz would see her relegated to being seen as a truly helpless cripple.  The Tea Party and their supporters would deny her the right to a life … deny her a “RIGHT-TO-LIFE”.

They will hem and haw but the fact remains, they oppose her getting prosthetics – especially if the government covered the cost, or the cost was covered by the employer being mandated to provide coverage.  Ted Cruz and the Tea Party would clearly support her being denied health care in the future – clearly she has a pre-existing condition and they oppose coverage of people with pre-existing conditions.

THE MOST HARM TO THE MOST PEOPLE

HER’S IS THE FACE OF ONE OF THOSE PEOPLE

HER’S IS THE FACE THE REPUBLICANS OPPOSE

DEATH OVER LIFE her life is what the Republicans will be working to destroy in 2015.  Now the decent people must start taking names and counting voices of all those who hate this young lady and what she represents… the true meaning behind the words “RIGHT-TO-LIFE” the right to live a productive life as one equal to her peers.

 

Tea Party Salesmen (ala Castro & Hitler)

Watching the Tea Party supporters, and reading their irrational rants against Obama and “Liberals” reminds me of those who supported Castro in Cuba (like Ted Cruz’s dad) and Hitler in 1930’s Germany.

Check there words.  Where is the assertion of a positive benefit for their own group?  How do THEY [the Tea Party rank & file voters] gain anything?

Does the Tea Party promise healthcare, better education, a better lifestyle, or some improvement to their standard of living and future economic security?

The answer is an obvious, and resounding, NO!

There is a vague idea that the deficit should be cut, but the companion idea is to reduce the Treasury income (Tax Revenues) needed to pay it off.  Instead we hear of spending cuts – generally  to the very social programs which have served to increase the American condition and distinguish it from third world nations … programs which make us either competitive with, or superior to, our economic competition.

They do not cut military spending – especially spending in foreign nations … spending that removes capital from our economy and injects it into the foreign GDP.

Hitler didn’t offer anything – he opposed, he blamed, he attacked the Jews and blamed them in the same way the Tea Party attacks the liberals [generally associated with both Jews and Blacks, but seldom with Christians – though the teachings of Jesus were devoutly liberal]

When Rafael Cruz fought with Castro, like most fighters of his age, he was fighting against the government – he was not fighting for Communism … at least that is what he now claims.  But, when Cruz Sr. came to America and availed himself of our educational system,  he wasn’t interested in fighting against Communism … instead we know he escaped to Canada rather than be subject to the 1960’s Vietnam Draft.  His son Ted was born in Canada ... is a natural born citizen of Canada; as such, is disqualified from the occupying the White House.

The pattern was simple, Rafael Cruz fought against, he did not fight for anything, and he taught his son that people will fight against anything – even their own best interest.  The matter is just one of phrasing it to conform to their prejudice – in the same way Hitler did.  His son is smart: he graduated Princeton, then magna cum laude from Harvard Law School.   He knows how to phrase a lie.

The Tea Party is against liberals [code for blacks & Jews], and they oppose freedom which comes from education and good health.  They oppose anything which betters the human condition.  If you doubt that, try to itemize programs they advocate which help the average person.

THERE ARE NONE!

The Tea Party will not advocate anything which fails to line the pockets of their elite with platinum… though they often settle for gold and silver.

Destroy the environment, YES they will do that.  Make life harder for those who do basic jobs, YES they will do that.  Take food from the hungry, leave the sick to die in the streets … they will do that to … though they will also make a big show of assisting the hungry and poor – if it allows them to solicit money to build their mansions.

the Tea Party does not stand FOR anything; but they do stand AGAINST everything that will in any way help make you, and your children, safer and more secure.

Of course, like Hitler, the Tea Party will only be seen for what it is after the harm is done.  Usually fifteen or 20 or 25 years after they come to power.  Funny thing, Hitler was an Austrian citizen until 7 April 1925, and became a German citizen after 25 February 1932 [renounced the former to officially be the latter then became Chancellor] … so he too was a dual national of sorts. 

Our Target Date – as provided in “Saint Paul’s Joke” – is 2034/5.  That is only twenty years from now … fifteen years from the time whoever is elected in 2016 has their legislation in place.   It will be interesting to see where the Jihad is at that time, and where it stands in 2034/5.  it will also be interesting to see what history says to those who have fought against the interests of so many, so that they could inflict

THE MOST HARM TO THE MOST PEOPLE 

 

One Step Closer (to Tea Party Goal)

By threatening to shut the government unless the Affordable Care act was defunded, the Tea Party and Republicans achieved the opposite of what they professed to seek – but reality is, it is exactly what they have always sought.  The government is closed, and the Affordable Care Act is going forward.  The goal was not to stop the Affordable Care Act, it was to disable the American Government.

THE MOST HARM TO THE MOST PEOPLE requires that they destroy America – it is exactly as al-Qaeda leaders have declared: increase deficit, decrease efficiency, hurt the people (in part) by denial of medical care.  Destroy, or otherwise weaken, the infrastructure.

Just watch.  Not today, but next year.  Where will the deficit be?  Up or down?  And will it be there because of the deal they make for ending this?  Consider:  Are they going to push for tax cuts?  That’s the quickest way to inflate the deficit – borrow rather than use income.  Wait and watch – enjoy the smoke and mirrors while the Tea Party does the work of al-Qaeda.

Heritage Foundation got the message

Well, been saying it all along – Republican deficit spending is not the way to go, and people instinctively know it … or they would be spending in the same way.  Now the Heritage Foundation has put it into graphic form:

NOTE: That $312,000 debt is NOT a mortgage on an asset which increases in value every year, while being used every day.  It is wasted money – money spent on stuff you don’t want to use, store away, then discard.

Ronald Reagan preached conservatism and doubled our debt; Bush 1 nearly doubled the debt, but was voted out after his first term; Bush two did double the debt.  So, in total we are roughly seven times a deep in debt as we were under Carter – who had the oil embargo to deal with – and they still call themselves “Conservative” and yell about having fiscally conservative policies.

Note, their policies include building weapons of mass destruction that even the military doesn’t want, while depriving the people of health and education.  Bush even used irrational testing to justify cuts to education – he tested different successive groups and argued the second should be equal to the first or the school fails.  Never mind that the test subjects are unrelated and have not direct connection to what was being taught in any given school in any given year… or even the baseline educational fitness (IQ, physical or mental problems, or domestic environment ) of the test subjects.

BUT WHO CARES!?  AFTER ALL, THE GOAL IS:

THE MOST HARM TO THE MOST PEOPLE