Book of Genesis Wisdom Lost

We had the knowledge in our year 525; but lost it around 1582.  That it has not been rediscovered until now just goes to show, how little real study of the text has been done, over the past centuries.

Granted, there has been a lot of attention paid to the theology and philosophy, but very little credit give to the hard science – in many cases, the science has actually been attacked or denied without any further comment.

In that regard, one need only mention the Bible on an internet thread, and the mindless attacks begin – with no regard for what is being stated.

But today’s topic is Lost Knowledge with a focus on the pervasive patriarch dating error which has been institutionalized across the internet – an error covered in the book: "GENESIS OF GENESIS".

First let’s look at the A+B=C structure which was used to define the patriarch ages.

For each patriarch we are told they were born, had a son when they were [A]-years-old, then lived [B]-years, and died at the age of [C]-years and we have  a+b=c as a ridged formula connecting ten of the first nine patriarchs who comprise the Book of Genesis ancestry.

Of the three who do not comply, we have the SHEM ERROR where the birth of Shem is mentioned in connection the end of the Flood and backward from the birth of his son; and the corresponding Flood reference for Noah which is referenced against the start of the Flood.  Then there is the error that conceals the secret behind the patriarch ages … the year in which the Traditional Chronologies have Adam die … at 930 in the year 930.  But Adam is been on the sixth day of the first year; thus, having celebrated his 930th year (which is clear from the a+b=c formula applied throughout the text is the way they cited the age at death), Adam would have died in the year 931 … a year which, in terms of the Calendar system, is highly significant.

How could this error have happened?  To understand we need to consider these calendar realities:  The system used was known by the Scythia Monk who gave us our year one, when he redid the calendar in our year 525.  But, the Bible was made public with both the King James and Guttenberg and those creation dates are important to the explanation.

The English translation of the Christian Bible for the Church of England begun in 1604 and completed in 1611 and is known as the King James Version. And in 1455, Gutenberg produced what is considered to be the first book ever printed: a Latin language Bible, printed in Mainz, Germany.

The Latin version would have simply presented the text as it was translated into Latin – no reference to the calendar chronology appears to exist -- or have been carried forward – because the calendar was both unreliable and, since the Church knew it had been redesigned in 525, there was no consistent basis for a Chronology which would not reveal the Hebrew origins –- the ones adopted to make the Roman and Hebrew Passover/Easter coincide – in a  now Christian Calendar system.

Look to the King James era for the error – the “Old Style and New Style dates” whereby, in the Catholic countries, a Gregorian calendar replaced the Julian.  It was a change in system that began in 1582 and was still in progress as late as 1752.  The King James Bible, hence the chronologies, appear in the middle of the transition – a time when the date confusion had people recording death as “in the #-year of their life” … thus the 930 for Adam was not the birthdays celebrated, but rather the years lived within from the day of birth.  In modern terms, one is legal at age 21, or are they legal in the 21st year of their life, which would mean the day after they celebrate their 20th birthday?

The book: "GENESIS OF GENESIS" reveals that which was lost – and shows how the Biblical Scholars who created the book were linked to the knowledge embodied in the stones of Stonehenge, and as the basis for multiple famous cultural calendars.

Those familiar with the patriarch ENOCH – who walks with God at the age of 365 will lean that his name and age embody 7 (as in days in a week); 52 (as in weeks in a year); the obvious 365 days in a year; and finally the Metonic Cycle which is the basis for both the Hebrew and Chinese Calendars …  as defined in Stonehenge.

The book: "GENESIS OF GENESIS" … clearing up an error and complying with THRICE cited dictate that we are to seek out all WISDOM, KNOWLEDGE AND UNDERSTANDING.

first solar eclipse of 2014

New report “the first solar eclipse of 2014. Solar eclipses occur when the moon passes between Earth and the sun.  Total eclipses, which produce the “diamond ring” effect, happen when the moon is closer to Earth and precisely covers the sun. For annular eclipses, the moon is a tiny bit further from earth, but still fits within the sun’s disc and has a skosh more room. Thus a “ring of fire” forms around moon’s silhouette.”

This is a non-central annular eclipse – and in the 5,000-year period from 2000 B.C. to 3000 AD, the earth only sees 68 non-central versions out of 3,956 annular eclipses.

“Death Over Life” – aside from the Four Blood Moons which occur on Hebrew Holidays between April 2014 and September 2015, we now have a one in 58 occurrence of this type of eclipse … narrow it down to the number until 2100AD and we are looking at something closer to 1:56 … where 56 is an important astronomical number in terms of ancient Stonehenge and the Book of Genesis … as was explained in the book “Genesis of Genesis”.

Get ready to see “Saint Paul’s Joke” in action – The Vatican and Rome are coming into the sniper’s sights.

FREE eBook Promotions

1. To allow those who love Bible History a chance to learn the real meaning of the Patriarch Ages -- and have an accurate Biblical Calendar (in Hebrew and Common year chronology)  There will be a  FREE 4 day Amazon (Kindle Direct) eBook Promotion of Genesis of Genesis beginning November 10 thru November 13, 2013.   This will be your opportunity to learn the True meaning of the Patriarch Ages.  [eBook is also offered free with all print edition orders].  Learn the real Biblical History concealed within the numbers -- this includes why, since King David designed it, the First Temple wasn't built until the fourth year of Solomon.

2. There will be a Free 4 day eBook Promotion for “Saint Paul’s Joke” on Amazon (Kindle Direct) December 10, 2013 December 13, 2013.  So five weeks warning ... eBook should also be free with the purchase of the print edition.  Prior to publication,“Saint Paul’s Joke” was studied by the Vatican experts for two solid months – at the conclusion of that period, it was added to the Vatican Archives, and the Pope began converting a nunnery into retirement residence; the month after it was formally published, Pope Benedict XVI, became the first Pope in 600 years to enter retirement.
NOTE: in the context of an episode entitled “The Real Jesus” – to appear on the History Channel [on December 2, 2013] Bible Secrets Revealed” series ... “Saint Paul’s Joke” provides the history of Jesus & his cousin John, and offers a never before conversation which suggests why Herod might have wanted Jesus dead, and why Joseph would accept a pregnant Mary as his wife ... without invoking "son of god" mythologies.

Answers to Long Standing Questions

“Charting OMER”

Charting The Patriarchs

 “Genesis of Genesis”

“Saint Paul’s Joke”

“Grandpa Was A Deity”

Defining Syrian Rebels

Advance word of the study appears in Monday’s edition of Britain’s Daily Telegraph:
Of the Syrian Rebels: 30,000 to 35,000 are hardline Islamists whose philosophy is similar to the jihadists, but are focused purely on Syria rather than an international revolution; at least a further 30,000 moderates belonging to groups that have an Islamic character.

Some 25,000 to 30,000, belong to secular groups with a democratic or nationalist orientation. In other words, between 25% and 30% of the total rebel force consists of groups considered friendly to the West.
Western diplomats who estimate that less than one third of the opposition forces are “palatable” to Britain, while American envoys put the figure even lower.

The dominant forces among the hardline factions are two Al Qaeda-linked groups, the Al-Nusra Front (Jabhat Al-Nusra) and the Islamic State in Iraq and A-Sham (or Iraq and the Levant).
According to yjr main author of the study is Charles Lister “Because of the Islamist make up of such a large proportion of the opposition, the fear is that if the West doesn’t play its cards right, it will end up pushing these people away from the people we are backing,” he said. “If the West looks as though it is not interested in removing Assad, moderate Islamists are also likely to be pushed further towards extremists.”

HUM – this sounds like exactly what I have been saying here.  If the West assists the Rebels, it is assisting those who hare the West; if it lets them fend for themselves, it is allowing us to get a step closer to the St. Malachy Prophecy and 2035.

“Saint Paul’s Joke” rules the inevitable outcome.  Those who say the are Christians, but ignore the teachings of Jesus, Peter and Paul, (which is 99.99 percent of them) are among those Jesus declared he would not know.  Of course, until they read “Saint Paul’s Joke” they aren’t going to get it.

As for Jews, the Hasidim appear to be among the screwed… they lack the requisite basis - “wisdom, knowledge and understanding” – to understand the scriptures and therefore had better read “Genesis of Genesis”, and to get their dates straight, maybe toss in two subsequent books: “Charting the Patriarchs” and “Charting OMER”.  At least they will then get their dates straight, and learn why the FIRST TEMPLE –- which was designed under King David – wasn’t built until the fourth year in the reign of Solomon … they year, not the King, was the controlling factor; to construct the TEMPLE again, they will need to know the reason it was build at that specific time … thus they can determine when its new foundations are due to be laid out. 

Of course, all the aforementioned books (“Saint Paul’s Joke”, “Genesis of Genesis”, “Charting the Patriarchs”, “Charting OMER”) require people to understand reality – as opposed to being lost in unfounded beliefs … those who prefer pagan beliefs are welcome to become CREATIONIST … they’re doomed anyway.

Female Rabbi - the Hasidic Effect

Apparently, as anyone who has attended a synagogue service within the past couple of years can readily attest, the presence on the bimah of a female rabbi and a female cantor has become commonplace.

Having an uncle who was a cantor with, what is best described as, a fantastic operatic voice, I long to her the fat lady sing in Shul – but, sadly, there are no Shuls  in my rural Maine community.

Still.  We should give credit for this evolution to those who truly deserve it – the Hassidim … the ultra-orthodox Jewish sect who have denounced the Biblical male line of descent and substituted one which is solely controlled by the female.

As anyone who has read the Book of Genesis knows, Hebrew lineage is father to son – not mother to daughter.  It is impossible to derive a Hebrew ancestry via a female line from Eve – but that is exactly what the Hassidim preach and practice.  For them “Moma Know, Father May Be” seems the controlling rule.  Face it, they are unsure of who the father of a child is, and so cannot say the child is Jewish … for them, a non-Jewish father is the same as a Jewish one … so long as the mother is Jewish, the kid is.  Which, sadly, raises the question as to whether or not any identified as Hassidim  are, in reality, Jewish at all.

But!  As I stated, the Hassidim have given us female Rabbis and Cantors – since, in accordance with their core beliefs, only the female who emerged from a Jewish female can truly be be said to be Jewish – all the rest must certainly be goyim … even the males who are in the line of direct descent from Aaron  (as established by DNA and the CMH).

Hey, if you don’t know if your own father is really your father, even the male founders of the Religion, and the ones with whom the covenant or Laws were established, must be rejected. 

  know,

 

Defense of Marriage Act = illegal

OK, finally … after the dishonesty of 1996, and Clinton’s failure of spine as reflected in his signing of DOMA, rather than issuing a VETO!

If these DOMA characters really wanted to “defend marriage”, they would have declared marriage a religious function and  declared the terms “marriage, married” and any related terms, as they appear in Federal Law,to now refer to Civil Unions Licensed by the States.

A marriage would hence forth be a ceremony officiated over by a religious figure and subject to the laws of the religious institution officiating (Hence, Catholics could not get divorced, Jews would require Rabbinical ‘Get’, etc).

They would also make it clear that Religious marriages are fully subject to religious tribunals, and are outside the jurisdiction of the Civil Courts.  Qualification for any State decreed, or provided, benefits would be available to those joined through Civil Unions, or any Religious marriages, providing they are licensed.  Thus, one can ‘marry’ without filing for a license – but they would have no Federal legal standing.

Failure to adhere to a Religious judgment would be deemed a ‘breech of contract’ and prosecuted in Civil Court by either the religious institution, or respective parties.  Civil Divorce Laws do NOT apply in religious marriages … and cannot be applied in any civil action.

The DOMA people will therefore get what they claim they seek, a declaration that marriage is a Divine Act.

Of course, because the DOMA people are hypocrites and have only harm as their goal, they will reject this.

Saint Paul’s Joke establishes here is no Biblical basis for the rejection of Gay Unions – but there is a clear and explicit basis to reject bi-sexual activities or any act of deception (“passing” or being “in the closet”).

Saint Paul’s Joke also establishes – chapter and verse – that the average Christian violates Romans 2:26 and therefore violates the basis for their religious salvation.

But DOMA people are happy with going to Hell – they just want to take everyone else with them.

Book Promotional Results

Well, it’ clear that people wanted to know the reason behind the extraordinary ages of the Biblical Patriarchs.  Apparently they didn’t realize that there were two related books also being offered.

They also seem to have overlooked Charting OMER, the Patriarch 49.

OMER, is a number, a numeric count equal to seven time seven.  It is by far the most interesting, though least utilized of the biblical numbers.

In each case, we have connected to Stonehenge and Genesis – but that is to be expected, assuming you have read “Grandpa Was A Deity” and therefore know the origins and connections of Hebrew culture, and its calendar.

The Book is working

New York Times, 15 June 2013, The Pope’s Gay Panic, By FRANK BRUNI.

Without acknowledging it, Frank Bruni is expanding on the words of Saint Paul’s Joke, and one of the failing of the Church which led Benedict XVI to resign and adopt a life of luxury before he must, like his predecessors, atone for a lifetime of sin.

In speaking of Francis I, Bruni stated: “What was clearer was his acknowledgment — rare for a pope, and thus remarkable — of the church’s worst-kept secret: a priesthood populous with gay men, even at the zenith. And that underscored anew the mystery and madness of the church’s attitude about homosexuality.” And then went on to state: “If homosexuality is no bar to serving as one of God’s emissaries and interpreters, if it’s no obstacle to being promoted to the upper rungs of the church’s hierarchy, how can it be so wrong? It doesn’t add up. There’s an error in the holy arithmetic.”

Saint Paul’s Joke, pointed out that Saul of Tarsus, St Paul, was very clear  in his mandate -- his followers were to abstain from sex, but if they were too weak to do so, they were to get married.  He did not say they were to marry and have children, and he did not say that marriage was restricted to a male and female – he did not even object to the idea of two men having sex.  In his day, even the Emperor of Rome publically, and with great fanfare, married a boy… and no follower of Jesus found cause to object.  Nor did any Jew have a basis to object.

There is one clause among the 613 Laws which deals with sex between two men – none which deal with it between two women – and that clause prohibits a man from having sex with BOTH men and women.  Either, or, but not both.

The design of Talumdic law is simple, if it is stated for one gender, it must be specifically stated for the other, or it only applies to the one.  Where  a law applies to both, the gender is expressed in a neutral manner (You/Thou shall not, as opposed to a man shall not, and/or a woman shall not). As pointed out in “The Genesis of Genesis”, Paul was rather specific:

In ROMANS {2:25} we are told: Circumcision profiteth indeed, if thou keep the law:  but if thou be a transgressor of the law, thy circumcision is made uncircumcision.

Therefore, if you are Jewish (only they and the Egyptian priesthood were circumcised) you still had to practice the law, or be deemed a pagan and be lost.

In ROMANS {2:26} we are told: If then, the uncircumcised keep the justices of the law, shall not this uncircumcision be counted for circumcision?

However, if you are a pagan who now followed Jesus, it was not necessary for you to risk your life in an adult circumcision, all you had to do was honor, obey, and adhere to the Law, and you would be counted among those who were circumcised – therefore be saved.

The beauty of the Catholic Church, and all of Christianity, is that they make it a point to violate the Laws – in terms expressed by Paul -- therefore none of them are subject to salvation.  When the Judgment day arrives – and Isaac Newton calculated it would arrive here within the next 20 to fifty years, a calculation agreed with in Saint Paul’s Joke --  something will happen and claim the lives and souls of Christians around the world… at least those who violate the law.  Who are they?  Start with asking about their Pork & beans Church functions, or bacon & eggs, or that bacon cheeseburger.  Of course, the real kicker comes with Christians who have sons... if they don't have a bris on the 8th day, they have officially screwed themselves -- the Law requires it, and Paul only exempted his converts, and only because of the pain and risks associated with adult circumcision.  But, to obey the Law meant the new born sons would  circumcised. 

Funny thing – Cheeseburgers are kosher.  The Law is, do not BOIL a CALF in its MOTHER’s MILK.   Abraham served the representatives of the deity meat and cheese and was blessed for it (the Haredim don’t tell you that, but they seldom understand the Law they are supposed to obey – look at their dating of biblical events and compare it to the Hebrew dates in “The Genesis of Genesis” … no Haredim knows, or could have published the facts you’ll find either in “The Genesis of Genesis”, or “Grandpa Was A Deity” ) .

Any case, pay attention to the news.  You will see more from “The Genesis of Genesis”, “Saint Paul’s Joke”, and “Grandpa Was A Deity”… though they might not provide the appropriate acknowledgement or citation.

Hold on to your hats…  al-Qaeda is planning an attack on Rome.