Answers to Long Standing Questions

“Charting OMER”

Charting The Patriarchs

 “Genesis of Genesis”

“Saint Paul’s Joke”

“Grandpa Was A Deity”

Defining Syrian Rebels

Advance word of the study appears in Monday’s edition of Britain’s Daily Telegraph:
Of the Syrian Rebels: 30,000 to 35,000 are hardline Islamists whose philosophy is similar to the jihadists, but are focused purely on Syria rather than an international revolution; at least a further 30,000 moderates belonging to groups that have an Islamic character.

Some 25,000 to 30,000, belong to secular groups with a democratic or nationalist orientation. In other words, between 25% and 30% of the total rebel force consists of groups considered friendly to the West.
Western diplomats who estimate that less than one third of the opposition forces are “palatable” to Britain, while American envoys put the figure even lower.

The dominant forces among the hardline factions are two Al Qaeda-linked groups, the Al-Nusra Front (Jabhat Al-Nusra) and the Islamic State in Iraq and A-Sham (or Iraq and the Levant).
According to yjr main author of the study is Charles Lister “Because of the Islamist make up of such a large proportion of the opposition, the fear is that if the West doesn’t play its cards right, it will end up pushing these people away from the people we are backing,” he said. “If the West looks as though it is not interested in removing Assad, moderate Islamists are also likely to be pushed further towards extremists.”

HUM – this sounds like exactly what I have been saying here.  If the West assists the Rebels, it is assisting those who hare the West; if it lets them fend for themselves, it is allowing us to get a step closer to the St. Malachy Prophecy and 2035.

“Saint Paul’s Joke” rules the inevitable outcome.  Those who say the are Christians, but ignore the teachings of Jesus, Peter and Paul, (which is 99.99 percent of them) are among those Jesus declared he would not know.  Of course, until they read “Saint Paul’s Joke” they aren’t going to get it.

As for Jews, the Hasidim appear to be among the screwed… they lack the requisite basis - “wisdom, knowledge and understanding” – to understand the scriptures and therefore had better read “Genesis of Genesis”, and to get their dates straight, maybe toss in two subsequent books: “Charting the Patriarchs” and “Charting OMER”.  At least they will then get their dates straight, and learn why the FIRST TEMPLE –- which was designed under King David – wasn’t built until the fourth year in the reign of Solomon … they year, not the King, was the controlling factor; to construct the TEMPLE again, they will need to know the reason it was build at that specific time … thus they can determine when its new foundations are due to be laid out. 

Of course, all the aforementioned books (“Saint Paul’s Joke”, “Genesis of Genesis”, “Charting the Patriarchs”, “Charting OMER”) require people to understand reality – as opposed to being lost in unfounded beliefs … those who prefer pagan beliefs are welcome to become CREATIONIST … they’re doomed anyway.

Female Rabbi - the Hasidic Effect

Apparently, as anyone who has attended a synagogue service within the past couple of years can readily attest, the presence on the bimah of a female rabbi and a female cantor has become commonplace.

Having an uncle who was a cantor with, what is best described as, a fantastic operatic voice, I long to her the fat lady sing in Shul – but, sadly, there are no Shuls  in my rural Maine community.

Still.  We should give credit for this evolution to those who truly deserve it – the Hassidim … the ultra-orthodox Jewish sect who have denounced the Biblical male line of descent and substituted one which is solely controlled by the female.

As anyone who has read the Book of Genesis knows, Hebrew lineage is father to son – not mother to daughter.  It is impossible to derive a Hebrew ancestry via a female line from Eve – but that is exactly what the Hassidim preach and practice.  For them “Moma Know, Father May Be” seems the controlling rule.  Face it, they are unsure of who the father of a child is, and so cannot say the child is Jewish … for them, a non-Jewish father is the same as a Jewish one … so long as the mother is Jewish, the kid is.  Which, sadly, raises the question as to whether or not any identified as Hassidim  are, in reality, Jewish at all.

But!  As I stated, the Hassidim have given us female Rabbis and Cantors – since, in accordance with their core beliefs, only the female who emerged from a Jewish female can truly be be said to be Jewish – all the rest must certainly be goyim … even the males who are in the line of direct descent from Aaron  (as established by DNA and the CMH).

Hey, if you don’t know if your own father is really your father, even the male founders of the Religion, and the ones with whom the covenant or Laws were established, must be rejected. 

  know,

 

Defense of Marriage Act = illegal

OK, finally … after the dishonesty of 1996, and Clinton’s failure of spine as reflected in his signing of DOMA, rather than issuing a VETO!

If these DOMA characters really wanted to “defend marriage”, they would have declared marriage a religious function and  declared the terms “marriage, married” and any related terms, as they appear in Federal Law,to now refer to Civil Unions Licensed by the States.

A marriage would hence forth be a ceremony officiated over by a religious figure and subject to the laws of the religious institution officiating (Hence, Catholics could not get divorced, Jews would require Rabbinical ‘Get’, etc).

They would also make it clear that Religious marriages are fully subject to religious tribunals, and are outside the jurisdiction of the Civil Courts.  Qualification for any State decreed, or provided, benefits would be available to those joined through Civil Unions, or any Religious marriages, providing they are licensed.  Thus, one can ‘marry’ without filing for a license – but they would have no Federal legal standing.

Failure to adhere to a Religious judgment would be deemed a ‘breech of contract’ and prosecuted in Civil Court by either the religious institution, or respective parties.  Civil Divorce Laws do NOT apply in religious marriages … and cannot be applied in any civil action.

The DOMA people will therefore get what they claim they seek, a declaration that marriage is a Divine Act.

Of course, because the DOMA people are hypocrites and have only harm as their goal, they will reject this.

Saint Paul’s Joke establishes here is no Biblical basis for the rejection of Gay Unions – but there is a clear and explicit basis to reject bi-sexual activities or any act of deception (“passing” or being “in the closet”).

Saint Paul’s Joke also establishes – chapter and verse – that the average Christian violates Romans 2:26 and therefore violates the basis for their religious salvation.

But DOMA people are happy with going to Hell – they just want to take everyone else with them.

The Book is working

New York Times, 15 June 2013, The Pope’s Gay Panic, By FRANK BRUNI.

Without acknowledging it, Frank Bruni is expanding on the words of Saint Paul’s Joke, and one of the failing of the Church which led Benedict XVI to resign and adopt a life of luxury before he must, like his predecessors, atone for a lifetime of sin.

In speaking of Francis I, Bruni stated: “What was clearer was his acknowledgment — rare for a pope, and thus remarkable — of the church’s worst-kept secret: a priesthood populous with gay men, even at the zenith. And that underscored anew the mystery and madness of the church’s attitude about homosexuality.” And then went on to state: “If homosexuality is no bar to serving as one of God’s emissaries and interpreters, if it’s no obstacle to being promoted to the upper rungs of the church’s hierarchy, how can it be so wrong? It doesn’t add up. There’s an error in the holy arithmetic.”

Saint Paul’s Joke, pointed out that Saul of Tarsus, St Paul, was very clear  in his mandate -- his followers were to abstain from sex, but if they were too weak to do so, they were to get married.  He did not say they were to marry and have children, and he did not say that marriage was restricted to a male and female – he did not even object to the idea of two men having sex.  In his day, even the Emperor of Rome publically, and with great fanfare, married a boy… and no follower of Jesus found cause to object.  Nor did any Jew have a basis to object.

There is one clause among the 613 Laws which deals with sex between two men – none which deal with it between two women – and that clause prohibits a man from having sex with BOTH men and women.  Either, or, but not both.

The design of Talumdic law is simple, if it is stated for one gender, it must be specifically stated for the other, or it only applies to the one.  Where  a law applies to both, the gender is expressed in a neutral manner (You/Thou shall not, as opposed to a man shall not, and/or a woman shall not). As pointed out in “The Genesis of Genesis”, Paul was rather specific:

In ROMANS {2:25} we are told: Circumcision profiteth indeed, if thou keep the law:  but if thou be a transgressor of the law, thy circumcision is made uncircumcision.

Therefore, if you are Jewish (only they and the Egyptian priesthood were circumcised) you still had to practice the law, or be deemed a pagan and be lost.

In ROMANS {2:26} we are told: If then, the uncircumcised keep the justices of the law, shall not this uncircumcision be counted for circumcision?

However, if you are a pagan who now followed Jesus, it was not necessary for you to risk your life in an adult circumcision, all you had to do was honor, obey, and adhere to the Law, and you would be counted among those who were circumcised – therefore be saved.

The beauty of the Catholic Church, and all of Christianity, is that they make it a point to violate the Laws – in terms expressed by Paul -- therefore none of them are subject to salvation.  When the Judgment day arrives – and Isaac Newton calculated it would arrive here within the next 20 to fifty years, a calculation agreed with in Saint Paul’s Joke --  something will happen and claim the lives and souls of Christians around the world… at least those who violate the law.  Who are they?  Start with asking about their Pork & beans Church functions, or bacon & eggs, or that bacon cheeseburger.  Of course, the real kicker comes with Christians who have sons... if they don't have a bris on the 8th day, they have officially screwed themselves -- the Law requires it, and Paul only exempted his converts, and only because of the pain and risks associated with adult circumcision.  But, to obey the Law meant the new born sons would  circumcised. 

Funny thing – Cheeseburgers are kosher.  The Law is, do not BOIL a CALF in its MOTHER’s MILK.   Abraham served the representatives of the deity meat and cheese and was blessed for it (the Haredim don’t tell you that, but they seldom understand the Law they are supposed to obey – look at their dating of biblical events and compare it to the Hebrew dates in “The Genesis of Genesis” … no Haredim knows, or could have published the facts you’ll find either in “The Genesis of Genesis”, or “Grandpa Was A Deity” ) .

Any case, pay attention to the news.  You will see more from “The Genesis of Genesis”, “Saint Paul’s Joke”, and “Grandpa Was A Deity”… though they might not provide the appropriate acknowledgement or citation.

Hold on to your hats…  al-Qaeda is planning an attack on Rome.