MIKE LUPICA the NY Daily News IDIOT!

According to: “Lupica: President Obama needs to take the lead and 'man up' against Russia and Putin over MH17 tragedy … Sen. Dianne Feinstein was the one to tell Putin to 'man up' over Russia's involvement in the downing of Malaysia Airlines Flight 17, but it's really Obama who should be stepping up given the evidence the government has.”

Get the headline and blurb, then read the story: Seems “…

the people to whom this President listens look like kids who have taken over the principal’s office, ones who apparently think they can treat the rest of us like suckers.”

Well maybe they are suckers – question is, is Lupica one of them or is he playing to an audience he knows to be suckers and idiots?

Consider this: Comparing current events to Cheney-Bush and “… their mission to take out another regional thug, Saddam Hussein, one who in retrospect looks no more unhinged or dangerous than Putin is presently.”

HUM, so Putin is equated to Saddam Hussein, and Hussein was attacked because he was holding down oil prices (which the Saudis didn’t like – and, in exchange for his Desert Storm debacle, after his term expired, paid Bush Sr. lots of no-show money through their Canadian operation).  Saddam was also holding the line against al-Qaeda, the other emerging terrorist groups and Iran – so George Jr put an end to that and we had twelve years of war, a doubling of the National Debt, excessive oil prices (again making Saudis happy) and Iran was free to explore the Nuclear Option.

Funny thing about the Saudis involvement with oil and the Bushes, the whole WAR ON TERROR was begun when Bush gave visas to 19 Saudis who then destroyed the World Trade Center, attacked the Pentagon, tried to attack the White House (funny how that was the plane that didn’t make it) and killed about 4,000 Americans.

Saudis pay Bush Sr., destroy WTC, amazingly fail in their alleged attempt to attack Bush Jr. and suddenly all the Saudis oil competitors are out of business – especially the one that was making sure oil prices stayed low.

Anyway, Lupica equates Putin to Hussein – and asserts “This doesn’t mean that Barack Obama should have threatened to start a war with Russia. He wasn’t about to do that any more than the sainted Ronald Reagan was going to do that when Russia shot a Korean Air commercial jet out of the sky 30 years ago.”

Lupica simply infers direct Russian involvement in the downing of a Dutch commercial airliner stupidly flown over a Civil War zone in the Ukraine.   Of course, Lupica fails to mention other Ukrainian war planes which were downed in the weeks prior to the event – or to establish that the airliner did all in its power to inform those in the ground that it was foreign, commercial and civilian – and not a high altitude Ukrainian bomber.

Hey – we need to beat-up on Russia in the same way we have for six decades, and exercise any excuse to hamper or otherwise diminish Obama’s ability to conduct foreign diplomacy is right in keeping with Right-wing political motives ultimately aimed at the destruction of America.

How do we accomplish the destruction of America?  Try destroy Europe!  Or any region upon which our economy depends.  Lupica would achieve this through this suggestion: “if the evidence is as good as we have been told, the President and his chief European allies must deliver the message that they are quite willing to bring down the Russian economy — and the billionaires it has produced, if necessary — if that’s what it takes to remove Russia’s president from power.”

Let’s see, we bring down the Russian economy, that removes Russia as a necessary allied power in ongoing Middle Eastern talks/negotiations with Iran.  If those talks fail, then we could see additional violence in the Middle East – compounding the Jihadist military actions in Syria and Gaza, while strengthening the ISIS takeover of Iraq.

HUM – so the Middle Eastern powder Keg explodes … and then, as Russia folds, so does 30% of the energy it supplies to Europe … GEE and the European economy goes where?

Compounding that energy stoppage with the stoppage of oil from Iraq, Iran, and  closing of the pipelines through Syria … how much of Europe’s energy vanishes?

And what of the Saudis?  Maybe the looming sectarian civil war that they have, to date, successfully prevented can finally be fought – the royal family can then flee to some ‘safe’ location and all of the world’s major oil supplies are suddenly in the hands of anti-American terrorist groups.

YEP Lupica is dead on in the wisdom of his suggestion and criticism of Obama’s handling of Putin – as Putin sits and watches developments in the Ukraine and takes the very threatening step of  authorizing a new Gambling District in the Crimea vacation resort area which has recently decided it prefers to be Russian rather than Ukrainian … and basically recognizes that it was Russian until Nikita Sergeyevich Khrushchev decided he didn’t want it.

So basically, Lupica is complaining because Obama isn’t forcing a continuation of a Communist Territorial decision that was made around the time Obama was born.

For that, Lupica, and apparently the New York Daily News as well, would like to see the world economy destroyed and the Jihadists move closer to fulfillment of the Koran mandate to kill all the “Bad Christians”.

Ah the fun.  

 

Syria resolved

US Secretary of State John Kerry has said, Syrian President Bashar al-Assad's regime deserves credit for complying with a chemical weapons deal.

OK ... now that is what,we needed. No nonsense,about bombs that aid al Qaeda or destabilize the Middle,East... we can leave that to the Tea Party Candidates ... if all goes according to schedule, the 2016 election will see a Democrat elected; then 2024 will have,an idiot Tea Party type and by 2032 we will be,facing the destruction of Rome, no oil, and a full scale "Modern" global war ... al Qaeda types in the streets rather than massive armies facing off.

OK ... you didn't read it here first ... but will, eventually learn that it,was said here first.

"SAINT PAUL'S JOKE" by then, nobody will be laughing, everyone will be praying, and it will be too late.

Syrian Plot Thickens

OK, now there is a purported video of the ones who used the Sarin Gas.  The poor-quality videos show men standing around an artillery vehicle, wearing what appear to be gas masks, with the cannon's barrel draped in large black flags bearing Islamic symbols and the name of rebel group Liwa al-Islam. 

In the video, the men chant "Allahu Akbar", or "God is great".  Liwa al-Islam eventually released a statement declaring the videos to be "completely fabricated" and blaming the Assad government which, it says, is the only force in Syria in possession of the weapons shown in the video.  “The videos contain jihadist paraphernalia which is perhaps a little too obvious, such as the large black flags and constant chanting," said BBC Monitoring's Mohamed Madi.

OK, so we have a staged boast film, or a real boast film.  In either case, it raises issues as to who was responsible for the gas, and why no rebels were among the dead.

Now the question is… IS THE VIDEO LEGITAMITE?

Those who want to bomb Syria will yell NO; those don’t want to bomb will yell YES; those with open minds will want to err on the side of caution – right now there is seems to be a stalemate and bombing Syria sides with the Rebels.  Is it that America want to side with Jihadists?

For those who want to bomb – as Bill Maher pointed out, for the past decade, we have been using drones to bomb Yemen, and they haven’t done a damned thing.  Americans like to murder people, and murdering Arabs is every bit as religiously correct now as it was a thousand years ago – be good Christians, murder as many people as possible.  If the Judgment period begins in 2034/5, then better get it out of your system now … Koran says Islamists are going to kill the “BAD CHRISTIANS” … “Saint Paul’s Joke” … eat pork and kill innocents … and you’re among the ones HE isn’t going to know, even though they claim to come in HIS name.

Of course, “Saint Paul’s Joke” might be wrong … after all, you are betting your life on your right to violate THE LAW.

THE MOST HARM TO THE MOST PEOPLE

IT IS THE CONSERVATIVE WAY

more Syrian fun and the Machiavellian scheme

While those,who want to bomb are pointing to UN REPORT indication probability of Syrian government responsibility, nobody is explaining why no rebel fighters were among the casualties. If it were a government attack the rebels would have been the target. But, if it were a jihadist attack, the killing of civilians would fit their normal MO... As seen in the marketplace, mosque and other terrorist attacks. Makes sense fir them to stage a sarin attack on civilians to use for the propaganda value against Assad.

In the USA, Syria is a Machiavellian scheme situation -- if we attack Assad, that makes the Rebel victory the result of American actions... they owe us an it will be hard for the Jihadist forces to turn the true Syrian populist rebels against us. The Republicans know that, if we refuse to help, when the rebels win they will attribute it to the majority Jihadist force among the rebels -- that allows the Jihadist elements to rally the people against America ... thus ensuring widespread war... First in Lebanon, and against Turkey ... with eventual attacks on Israel -- when Egypt is stable enough to join in.

The second part of the scheme is to nominate Ted Cruz for President in 2016. This will precipitate a Constitutional Crisis in which the candidate is undeniably a Canadian by birth, who spent the first four years of his life as a Canadian citizen. The specific language of the Constitutional qualification clause will come into play if Cruz is either the Presidential, or vice-Presidential, candidate (or worse, nominee elect). That could paralyze the "Commander-in-Chief" position long enough to ensure an opening for the Jihadists to wage their war.

Defining Syrian Rebels

Advance word of the study appears in Monday’s edition of Britain’s Daily Telegraph:
Of the Syrian Rebels: 30,000 to 35,000 are hardline Islamists whose philosophy is similar to the jihadists, but are focused purely on Syria rather than an international revolution; at least a further 30,000 moderates belonging to groups that have an Islamic character.

Some 25,000 to 30,000, belong to secular groups with a democratic or nationalist orientation. In other words, between 25% and 30% of the total rebel force consists of groups considered friendly to the West.
Western diplomats who estimate that less than one third of the opposition forces are “palatable” to Britain, while American envoys put the figure even lower.

The dominant forces among the hardline factions are two Al Qaeda-linked groups, the Al-Nusra Front (Jabhat Al-Nusra) and the Islamic State in Iraq and A-Sham (or Iraq and the Levant).
According to yjr main author of the study is Charles Lister “Because of the Islamist make up of such a large proportion of the opposition, the fear is that if the West doesn’t play its cards right, it will end up pushing these people away from the people we are backing,” he said. “If the West looks as though it is not interested in removing Assad, moderate Islamists are also likely to be pushed further towards extremists.”

HUM – this sounds like exactly what I have been saying here.  If the West assists the Rebels, it is assisting those who hare the West; if it lets them fend for themselves, it is allowing us to get a step closer to the St. Malachy Prophecy and 2035.

“Saint Paul’s Joke” rules the inevitable outcome.  Those who say the are Christians, but ignore the teachings of Jesus, Peter and Paul, (which is 99.99 percent of them) are among those Jesus declared he would not know.  Of course, until they read “Saint Paul’s Joke” they aren’t going to get it.

As for Jews, the Hasidim appear to be among the screwed… they lack the requisite basis - “wisdom, knowledge and understanding” – to understand the scriptures and therefore had better read “Genesis of Genesis”, and to get their dates straight, maybe toss in two subsequent books: “Charting the Patriarchs” and “Charting OMER”.  At least they will then get their dates straight, and learn why the FIRST TEMPLE –- which was designed under King David – wasn’t built until the fourth year in the reign of Solomon … they year, not the King, was the controlling factor; to construct the TEMPLE again, they will need to know the reason it was build at that specific time … thus they can determine when its new foundations are due to be laid out. 

Of course, all the aforementioned books (“Saint Paul’s Joke”, “Genesis of Genesis”, “Charting the Patriarchs”, “Charting OMER”) require people to understand reality – as opposed to being lost in unfounded beliefs … those who prefer pagan beliefs are welcome to become CREATIONIST … they’re doomed anyway.

Is it about OIL?

Glenn Beck explained that there are two oil and natural gas pipelines that have been vying for access to Syria, one of which would go through Iran and Iraq, the other of which would go through Qatar and Saudi Arabia.  The latter was denied by Syria, Beck said, much to the dismay of Qatar and Saudi Arabia.

Saudi Arabia offered to pay for a U.S. strike on Syria.  “It’s all about money and oil.  They want a pipeline, and they are prepared to do anything to get the pipeline that benefits them as opposed to the other pipeline.”

GEE… Iran and Iraq to Russia, or Qatar and Saudi Arabia to the West.

And what strike could America possibly make which would not result in troops feet on the ground?  What tempered strike would not result in a mess which cuts the flow of oil?

Syrian Vote Scorecard

To reiterate the basics:

Syria is not a signatory of the Chemical Weapons Treaty, therefore they are not violating a recognized legal duty.

Syria has not utilized its chemicals beyond the confines of its borders, nor have they drifted beyond those borders.

Syria is engaged in a Civil War – foreign nations have no legal basis for engaging in actions which benefit one party over the other … unless they declare their support.  Any attack on Assad has the effect of supporting the Jihadist or al Qaeda elements in the Rebel camp.

Supporting the Jihadist or al Qaeda elements in the Rebel camp, which supports those who engaged in 9/11, and the attack on American cities and citizens, is a clear act of TREASON against the American people.  Note that 36% have declared their wish to see America attacked again – this is clear by their willingness to strengthen al Qaeda.

Destroy Assad and assist the combined Jihadist/al Qaeda elements … the effect will be an al Qaeda takeover of the region and the eventual destruction of Saudi Arabia … with it our access to Middle Eastern oil.  That would then ensure the collapse of America in the same way that depriving Hitler’s Germany of that oil helped bring them down.

Remember, the Republican Party has been steadfast in its opposition to American Energy Independence and the use of – along with the expansion of – renewable energy resources.  OIL $$$$$’s have lined their pockets at the cost of American long term security.

Consider the timeline we can glean from history.

Al Qaeda takes over Syria, and, with the blessing and devout thanks to the Republicans and George Bush, has a strong foothold in Iraq.  Now, with the support of Iran, the Persian Empire is being rebuilt.  Lebanon will be the next target, and they are already active in Egypt.  Israel can be overrun… out comically, they might ignore Israel.

Historically, Turkey is a better target … that means an expansion into the Ottoman Empire and north into the Pale of Settlement to join their Russian supporters.  This would involve a decade, maybe slightly more.  If, in that time, America has a two term Republican President, they would either be attacked – in any region they have not yet taken over, so as to weaken the way for them – or we will see concerted efforts to increase American debt and energy vulnerability.

The move westward would begin with the death of Pope Francis and election of the next and last Pope Francis I(born in 1936, so now 76 with a life expectancy under a decade).  Thus the fun begins in 2024 to 2032.

Given 2035 is both the opening date for the St. Malachy Prophecy and the Biblical Cycle projection established by Sir Isaac Newton – and independently in “Saint Paul’s Joke” … as based on the Biblical math as revealed in “Genesis of Genesis” – there is no question that forces of destruction are pushing us into a countdown designed to inflict

THE MOST HARM TO THE MOST PEOPLE

Chemical Weapons – reality

It’s not that chemical weapons are more lethal than conventional ones, they’re just more grisly and less discriminate.  Chemical weapons are poorly targeted and subject to the vagaries of the wind and so are inherently a threat to civilian populations – or, to be more specific in terms devised during their early use in WW1, they come back on your own troops.  Thus, the civilian population argument is one which masks the reality of the potential damage they can do tot those who use them.

If you intend to use chemical weapons, you must use them on civilians and the enemy … while making sure your forces are far far away.

If you are a Western Power, and the “enemy” is Middle Eastern or Asian, the idea is to use conventional weapons and say “opps” when they kill the civilians.

As has been said, “The ban on chemical weapons, in other words, is proof that humanity can make war a little more decent. Consequently, its continued success is vital to all future efforts to make war a little more decent. There is a kind of beauty in that, but much less so when you recall the 100,000 Syrians killed by nonchemical weapons.”  [Washington Post, 9/7/13] Which went on to say, “we should imagine that “it’s 2035, and this-or-that dictator is thinking of using chemical weapons. Do you want them to say Assad used them on a large scale in August of 2013, nothing happened, …””

Gee 2035 cited in the Washington Post … where have we seen that date before … could it be in the posts below, or maybe in “Saint Paul’s Joke”?

As the WP concedes, we have a bit of a problem with the use of chemical weapons by Syria: “almost every country on Earth has signed the treaty against the use of chemical weapons; Syria is a rare holdout.”  If Syria has NOT signed the accord, then we have no legal grounds for holding them to the terms of the accord.  They are not part of the treaty system and are therefore free to use any weapon they wish INSIDE THEIR OWN BORDERS!

To use any weapon outside their borders is would be an act of war against the nation whose territory they are used on.   If any nation attacks Syria, they are declaring war on a sovereign state – they are the aggressor.  I am reminded of the ancient Oracle: “The first one into the war will lose.”  That is, the nation who attacks is the one who will ultimately lose the war.  Doubt that?  Look at Korea, or Vietnam.  Look at Germany in the first and second world wars.  Pick the point in history you wish to focus on – how many times has the aggressor ultimately won?

2035 – the year when Judgment Day begins.  Do we make it happen, or do we work to avoid causing that stupid calculation to be correct?

For now, it seems we are doing all in our power to make it a self-fulfilling prophecy.  Does it matter that it is based on math that is three thousand years old?   Or the math as interpreted by Sir Isaac Newton?  Or the math displayed in “Saint Paul’s Joke”?

THE MOST HARM TO THE MOST PEOPLE

IT APPEARS TO BE THE HUMAN WAY OF LIFE

LOOK AT THE RED – STAY CLEAR OF THEM… THEY DIDN’T SIGN.

Kill Arabs or Help average Americans?

The Bush Regime never had respect for the Constitution -- which specifies that Congress Declares War.
Call it a "WAR" and Congress has to authorize it.
Being "Commander-in-chief" and running that "war"kicks in after that declaration.
America has no business "punishing" the rulers of other nations -- of course, if we wish to assume that role, then we MUST apply that authority to ALL nations.  Selective application of arbitrary rules of morality are, in themselves, immoral.
The only consistent aspect between Iraq and Syria is that American military action serves only to aid Jihadists and al Qaeda.  It in no way has, or will, aid the average person within those nations.
Moreover, this intervention pulls resources from those things which most serve people -- things mandated by the the Text which is supposed to govern western religions.
Limited action in Syria will cost one BILLION dollars every two days ... what if that, apparently available to waste, money were directed to rural educational needs, or to ObamaCare (or a better medical program of Republican choice), or to making Social Security stronger?
Or, since the budget has that money to waste, why not a BILLION dollars every two days to reduce Income taxes for either the very rich, or by raising the low end amount where tax liabilities kick in?  After all, we seem to have the money to spend to kill Arabs -- why not use it to make life for the average American better?

pick a side: Assad or al Qaeda

"Members of Congress, during two days of occasionally combative hearings on Syria earlier this week, have pushed for the president to make a more direct case to the public before the United States punishes Syria for using chemical weapons."
so goes the news story on Obama trying to push his case for attack to the American people.

Problem... attack one side, help the other. The case Obama makes MUST address the,question of,why America should give the rebels - Jihadists and al Qaeda - free air cover. That is, after all, exactly what we would be doing.

Of course, if you follow the news, you know that certain Arab states would be happy to foot the cost of an all out attack... one that destroys Assad and gives the Jihadists control of the region and the ability to erase Israel from existence. It would seem Obama and McCain want that. So Obama needs to establish exactly why he wants to set the stage for the destruction of Israel and Democracy in the Middle East.

Chemical weapons can be dealt with when the civil war is over ... a war crimes, or crimes against humanity action can be taken and Assad can be stood against a wall and shot...
and the UN can handle it.

Why the rush to assist Jihadists? Will the tea party types be proved right... does Obama really support them ...as Bush supported Ben Laden?

Stay tuned... the fun is about to start.

Democrats for Destruction of World

According to a Huff Post article today (15 Sept), we can look to theses Demoncrats (Democrats) to support the wholesale murder of innocents.  Only 15 votes:

No on Iraq / Expected yes on Syria

• Sen. Boxer (D-Calif.)
• Sen. Cardin (D-Md.)*
• Sen. Durbin (D-Ill.)
• Sen. Leahy (D-Vt.)
• Sen. Levin (D-Mich.)
• Sen. Menéndez (D-N.J.)*
• Sen. Stabenow (D-Mich.)
• ====================
• Rep. Becerra (D-Calif.)
• Rep. Hastings (D-Fla.)
• Rep. Langevin (D-R.I.)
• Rep. Levin (D-Mich.)
• Rep. Moran (D-Va.)
• Rep. Pelosi (D-Calif.)
• Rep. Rahall (D-W.Va.)
• Rep. Sanchez (D-Calif.)

Fifteen votes doesn’t do it.  But they also have these warmonger votes:

Yes on Iraq / Expected yes on Syria

• Sen. Carper (D-Del.)
• Sen. Feinstein (D-Calif.)
• Sen. Nelson (D-Fla.)
• Sen. Reid (D-Nev.)
• Sen. Schumer (D-N.Y.)
• ===================
• Rep. Deutch (D-Fla.)
• Rep. Engel (D-N.Y.)
• Rep. Hoyer (D-Md.)
• Rep. Israel (D-N.Y.)
• Rep. Pascrell (D-N.J.)
• Rep. Sherman (D-Calif.)
• _____________________ Eleven Demoncrats
• Sen. Burr (R-N.C.)*
• Sen. Toomey (R-Pa.)*
• Sen. Vitter (R-La.)*
• Sen. Chambliss (R-Ga.)*
• Sen. Flake (R-Ariz.)*
• Sen. Graham (R-S.C.)*
• Sen. Isakson (R-Ga.)*
• Sen. Kirk (R-Ill.)*
• Sen. McCain (R-Ariz.)
• ====================
• Rep. Boehner (R-Ohio)
• Rep. Rogers (R-Mich.)
• Rep. Ros-Lehtinen (R-Fla.)
• Rep. Cantor (R-Va.)
• Rep. King (R-N.Y.)
• ___________________ Fourteen Republicans

FORTY PEOPLE DEVOTED TO THE MURDER OF INNOCENTS.

The Killing Innocents is prohibited in the Koran – al Qaeda types don’t care about the Koran, nor do those Jihadists who impose the strict Sharia Law.  In the Koran, The Prophet declares the necessity for Women to cover themselves.  TRUE… But He states it is because the males are too immoral, too godless, too despicable to allow a woman to walk the streets without fear.  ARAB MEN ARE ANIMALS in the eyes of the Koran and The Prophet.

Thee is a harsh reality:  The average loud mouthed fundamentalist – be they Orthodox Jewish, Evangelical Christian, of Sharia spouting Islamist – violates their religious text at every opportunity.  It is “Saint Paul’s Joke” made universal – so as to ensure that the Prophecy is fulfilled (of course, the fundamentalists are discarded at judgment, they are a demonic waste of space and unfit for any place in Paradise).

THE MOST HARM TO THE MOST PEOPLE

THOSE WHO SUPPORT IT TAKE MANY FORMS.

NOW FOR THOSE WHO HAVE BEEN SEDUCED BY EVIL:

They were NO on Iraq / but Expected YES on Syria

• Sen. Boxer (D-Calif.)
• Sen. Cardin (D-Md.)*
• Sen. Durbin (D-Ill.)
• Sen. Leahy (D-Vt.)
• Sen. Levin (D-Mich.)
• Sen. Menéndez (D-N.J.)*
• Sen. Stabenow (D-Mich.)
• ====================
• Rep. Becerra (D-Calif.)
• Rep. Hastings (D-Fla.)
• Rep. Langevin (D-R.I.)
• Rep. Levin (D-Mich.)
• Rep. Moran (D-Va.)
• Rep. Pelosi (D-Calif.)
• Rep. Rahall (D-W.Va.)
• Rep. Sanchez (D-Calif.)

Fifteen more votes … bringing those wishing for a Third World War … or Islamic Jihad that destroys Rome …

This means there are FIFTY FIVE people in power, in Washington, who want the world to end… or are working to destroy this nation.

It might be interesting to have a close look at their voting record.

__________________________________________________

blame Israel for any act toward Syria

President Obama referred to Israel in his Rose Garden address, saying that leaving the use of chemical weapons by Assad “endangers our friends and our partners along Syria’s borders, including Israel, Jordan, Turkey, Lebanon and Iraq.” He repeated this message on Sunday, too.

ok so Syria endangers our friends... but the border is the thing... if no gas is used along the border, then it is none of our business ... at least not until conflict is over and war crimes trials can begin.

if we use the danger aspect... then America,and Russia need to be destroyed! those two nations hold weapons of mass destruction, and their willingness to attack nations and people (who did not attack them) displays a clear disregard for human life. China in Tibet means China should also be destroyed.

Congress is free to wage any war it wishes ... naturally... the guiding force will be

THE MOST HARM TO THE MOST PEOPLE
it is our way... is it not?