House of Representatives officially abandons the RULE OF LAW

 Just before 12:20 p.m., President Biden official canceled the Trump administration ban on individuals undergoing transgender transformation from serving in the military — with a stroke of the pen, Biden allowed individuals who needed daily medical care, and were therefore unfit for deployment, to be on the military payroll.

Though his order effectively weakened the military, the hallmark of the Biden Administration would be the impeachment of a former president, shown to be clearly unconstitutional by the failure of the Chief Justice to preside.  When a CNN reporter attempted to  question Biden about whether impeachment would imperil his agenda, Biden did not answer.  This was not a crime he was inclined to boast of.

When the Constitution or any legal mandate says "shall", qualified lawyers and judges understand that to be an absolute condition. And while other impeachment are flexible, Article I, Section 3 of the Constitution is clear about any action against a PRESIDENT being overseen by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court -- as opposed to a Senate President pro tem acting as both judge and jurist.

Because impeachment is an act of removal from office, the Constitutional action only applies to a sitting President of one who has not already been legally removed from office.

One 3 November, Trump was legally removed, as later affirmed by the Electoral College, and, at noon on 20 January the Senate lost its Constitutional right to hold an impeachment trial.  Should that change, every former president can be tried, convicted, and lose all their rights of privileges earned by once holding that office.  Richard Nixon could be tried in absentia, as could both George H W and George W Bush.  Even Abraham Lincoln could be tried for his Emancipation Proclamation, which was issued when it was still constitutional to own slaves -- a legal fact which overshadows any retroactive moral assertion, even if that assertion is now the legal fact.

Just months after the new Vice President, Kamala Harris, organized to pay the bail for rioters who violently attached and destroyed, speaking on the Senate floor for the House Managers, Representative Jamie Raskin would assert that Trump's exercise of free speech and a call to the public to voice their views, had been an act where “Donald John Trump engaged in high crimes and misdemeanors by inciting violence against the government of the United States.”

Even if it could be factually demonstrated to be true, the proper and lawful legal venue to adjudicate the charge remained the civil court and not the floor of the Senate.  But obedience to the Constitution and due process is not something we would expect from the representative of a "Kangaroo Court" that issues an indictment, votes impeachment, without witnesses, evidence, or a hearing of qualified legal experts with regard to jurisdiction.

When it held its two hour impeachment, the House demonstrated it no longer supports the "Rule of Law" or anything even approaching a American standard of "Due Process."

Pelosi seeks to destroy democracy

Liberal George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley expressed the opinion that, while “Democrats are seeking to remove Trump on the basis of his remarks to supporters before the rioting at the Capitol. ...his address does not meet the definition for incitement under the criminal code.  It would be viewed as protected speech by the Supreme Court.”

As a result, Pelosi, Schumer, and the rest of those seeking the downfall or destruction of America are, in Turley's words, “now seeking an impeachment for remarks covered by the First Amendment.”  Turkey went on to point to the hypocrisy within his own party and pointed the fact that some of his fellow“Democrats are pushing this dangerously vague standard while objecting to their remarks given new meaning from critics.”  In effect, they are guilty of the very accusations they throw at Trump.

Turkey pointed out that while “The damage caused by the rioters this week was enormous, however, it will pale in comparison to the damage from a new precedent of a snap impeachment for speech protected under the First Amendment. ... In a process of deliberative judgment, the reference to a snap impeachment is a contradiction. In this new system, guilt is not doubted and innocence is not deliberated.” 

Effectively, Turkey has declare the new system is based on the idea of being guilty as charged without any right to a fair trial or ability to establish innocence.  Under such conditions, as Senate leader, Schumer will rush through the first conviction in history, and individuals like Nader and Schiff will declare "overwhelming evidence" that they will never need to cite or explain in a coherent and lawful manner. 
As noted in need reports, Turley cited specific examples of the “vague standard” the Democratic leadership has now established as their means of judgment: “Conservatives have pointed to Maxine Waters asking her supporters to confront Republicans in restaurants, while Ayanna Pressley insisted amidst the violent marches last year that there needs to be unrest in the streets’ and Kamala Harris said ‘protesters should not let up’ even as some of those marches turned violent.” 
The rule of law has ended, Biden is above the law, and the era of American fascism has been offered for acceptance by the masses willing to see The Emperor's New Clothes.

Medieval Warming, Climate Change, REVELATION prophecy, events in 2021

It seems we're headed into another comical aspect of Biblical Prophecy: Are we in the Revelation Era and Death Over Life: Secret of Revelation: A Prophecy of America's Destruction it involves what science has labeled as the "Medieval Warm Period (MWP) 1 - Grand Solar Minimum - Climate Change" and what we know of refer to as CLIMATE CHANGE today.

The cycles of global warming approximately correspond to the 980 or 1000 year cycle used in the Book of Revelation to mark the two periods of change -- we are, if course, at the second change and it began with Hitler in 1931.

Donald John Trump is a pawn in the events -- one alternative -- and Joseph R Biden is another pawn.  Hence we get book 11 in the Trump Card series, SATAN'S VOTE: Biden Your Time. And, apparently, the need for a book 12.

I love how things that seem silly come together and show their meaning.

I also love how people deny reality, and insist they see the Emperor's New Clothes, whenever possible.  As of today, Joe Biden is officially the President-elect and we now await the outcome of the zero-year curse.  Will he did in office and this have Kamala Harris be elevated to the Oval to become the first female POTUS and break the historic cycle which dates it's origins to the Medieval Warm Period and the 4-Sisters?

We have three or four years in which to find out.  The fun begins with the 2022 election and the changes that will reflect the reaction to people voting in record numbers to keep it reject Trump...they certainly did NOT vote FOR Biden -- a man routinely, in the past, denied the nomination, and in the present know to have bragged about a Quid pro quo blackmail of a foreign power for the purpose of concealing his son's qusi-criminal activities.