Sunday, September 7, 2014

House Lawsuit against Obama

The issue behind a lawsuit is one of discussed is REDRESS – the legal remedy which would make the injured party whole…

The law firm of Baker & Hostetler has been retained to prepare the  case – with a reported guarantee of $350,000 for work done before new Congress convenes in 2015.  Apart for whatever nonsense argument they invoke to justify that money, what would they have the Court do to correct whatever alleged wrong was done?

The case relies on the actions of the Chief Executive, and not the private actions of citizen Obama.   Therefore, monetary damages would be paid by the Federal government – so Congress would need to appropriate funds to pay the judgment on the lawsuit it brought. (OK I mentioned that in a posting when this nonsense was first mentioned, but now lawyers are involved and they will need to tell the court the answer.)

Removal of Obama requires Impeachment, which the House has, via the lawsuit, demonstrated it has no grounds to seek.   Even a court victory would not provide grounds.

QUESTION: Does Baker & Hostetler contribute to GOP?

If so, this is a great means of providing the capital.  Even assuming a 35% tax rate, the guarantee would reimburse a quarter million in campaign contributions, or make an addition quarter million available for last minute donation prior to November. 

Basically, a great way to launder federal funds to support a political party facing election in two months.

No comments: