Prophecy is interesting:
The first POTUS (President of the United States), George Washington, was born in 1731 by the Old (Julian) Calendar, 1732 by the New (Gregorian) Calendar, which was adopted by Great Britain and the colonies in 1752.
ONE YEAR difference -- does it make a difference?
Nostradamus (1503 – 1566) wrote his "Centuries" -- his hundred prophecies -- fully two centuries before Washington and the Revolution, or the change in the Calendar.
Should Nostradamus have played games with his dates, so as to compensate for that change which affected one yet to be created nation?
In answering that, note there was another change/system which made the seventh month the ninth month. We use January 1st as the start of the year, because it is the eighth day after the date the Church decreed Jesus was born, and thus the day upon which he would have been circumcised ... and not everyone recognized the Church dating system.
Nostradamus predicted:
"In the year 1999 and seven months,
From the sky will come the great King of Terror.
He will bring back to life the great king of the Mongols.
Before and after war rules happily."
With the various shifts, like those cited above, and utilizing something like the Hebrew Calendar, the 7th month of 1999 easily becomes the 9th month of 2001.... more specifically 9/11/2001, when, from the sky.
In 1294, the Mongols controlled what is now Afghanistan. in 1994, Bin Laden (who controlled the region) declared he wanted Hussein dead and the American economy to fold -- seven hundred years ... a possible reason to keep the 7 in the prophecy.
Now, in 2015, as it did before 9/11, War still "rules happily" and the American economy is awash in debt.
Do we accept, allow for, or deny, prophecy?
Do we accept, allow for, or deny, Climate Change?
Do we accept, allow for, or deny, Global Warming?
Do we accept, allow for, or deny, the words of Revelation which say a third of all life will die in this era?
And, in that regard, do we refute the scientific projections of species extinctions which would seem to affirm the prediction ... while population studies are saying that the Human population could begin a one-third decline when the last of the Baby-Boom generation reaches the century mark?
Death Over Life -- it does not need a Global War or the end of all mankind (as the Evangelicals seem to insist), it only needs the world continuing on the course to which it seems committed.
The issue will be: Which third of humanity will die off to the greatest extent -- Evangelicals, and Extreme Right-wing Republicans, would love for that death to be centered around America ... look at their attacks on the poor, the elderly and others in need (as defined by 'their' Jesus).
The first POTUS (President of the United States), George Washington, was born in 1731 by the Old (Julian) Calendar, 1732 by the New (Gregorian) Calendar, which was adopted by Great Britain and the colonies in 1752.
ONE YEAR difference -- does it make a difference?
Nostradamus (1503 – 1566) wrote his "Centuries" -- his hundred prophecies -- fully two centuries before Washington and the Revolution, or the change in the Calendar.
Should Nostradamus have played games with his dates, so as to compensate for that change which affected one yet to be created nation?
In answering that, note there was another change/system which made the seventh month the ninth month. We use January 1st as the start of the year, because it is the eighth day after the date the Church decreed Jesus was born, and thus the day upon which he would have been circumcised ... and not everyone recognized the Church dating system.
Nostradamus predicted:
"In the year 1999 and seven months,
From the sky will come the great King of Terror.
He will bring back to life the great king of the Mongols.
Before and after war rules happily."
With the various shifts, like those cited above, and utilizing something like the Hebrew Calendar, the 7th month of 1999 easily becomes the 9th month of 2001.... more specifically 9/11/2001, when, from the sky.
In 1294, the Mongols controlled what is now Afghanistan. in 1994, Bin Laden (who controlled the region) declared he wanted Hussein dead and the American economy to fold -- seven hundred years ... a possible reason to keep the 7 in the prophecy.
Now, in 2015, as it did before 9/11, War still "rules happily" and the American economy is awash in debt.
Do we accept, allow for, or deny, prophecy?
Do we accept, allow for, or deny, Climate Change?
Do we accept, allow for, or deny, Global Warming?
Do we accept, allow for, or deny, the words of Revelation which say a third of all life will die in this era?
And, in that regard, do we refute the scientific projections of species extinctions which would seem to affirm the prediction ... while population studies are saying that the Human population could begin a one-third decline when the last of the Baby-Boom generation reaches the century mark?
Death Over Life -- it does not need a Global War or the end of all mankind (as the Evangelicals seem to insist), it only needs the world continuing on the course to which it seems committed.
The issue will be: Which third of humanity will die off to the greatest extent -- Evangelicals, and Extreme Right-wing Republicans, would love for that death to be centered around America ... look at their attacks on the poor, the elderly and others in need (as defined by 'their' Jesus).
meets
No comments:
Post a Comment