LOUISIANA & ABORTION dropping the PERSON BOMB

 Proposed Louisiana bill seeks to criminalize abortion, charge women with murder

On 12 May 2022, Louisiana's House of Representatives began debating a bill that would subject women who obtain an abortion to criminal prosecution for murder.  BUT, murder only applies to a person... and that means the fetus must be declared a person.

Have FUN.  Under the Constitution, any and all persons must be enumerated in a census...and tax deductions apply to persons living in the household and being fully supported... the fetus "parasite" is fully supported by its host... that means it is a tax deduction ... a person-type deduction...  one that changes the demographics of a political district and state... it changes the representative apportionment.

I'd love to see an ambitious group of intelligent lawyers play this game for all its worth...  after all, can someone murder a lifeform that is not a person?  can a lifeform be a person without being a person?

The Bible says a fetus is the property of the father...birthright, personhood, begins when they emerge alive from the mother -- in whole or in part... stick a foot or hand out, pull it back, the birthright is still there. 

Louisiana's House of Representatives is opening a kettle of worms.... a timebomb that must eventually be defused by SCOTUS or explode.

To date, both pro-life and freedom-of-choice camps have worked hard not to force the definition of when personhood begins... "LIFE" can apply to a human DNA-infused parasite (cancer is a version, as are tumors).  BUT MURDER requires a person to kill. 

==========================

NOTE:

Since the draft SCOTUS decision was released I have been planning (trying to work out the wording for) a BLOG calling for lawyers to force the distinction they have been avoiding.

Basic fact, a fetus is a parasite -- it is not a life until the umbilical cord is cut.

YES!  Birthrights can begin when the limb exits the body... but independent life might not start... breathing and a heartbeat are needed... not just a heartbeat sustained by the mother (acting as an incubator).

The entity MUST be independent -- have the umbilical cord cut -- to be a person.   The court must state that...CONGRESS must state that...they MUST define a PERSON in terms of LIFE.

Watch the idiots avoid the question again.

NOTE, if Louisiana passes the murder law... it will cascade across the nation... personhood would begin at conception and morning-after pills or abortion pills will be murder.  Of course, hard to prove unless you can prove conception...but still murder for the purpose of those promoting THE MOST HARM TO THE MOST PEOPLE.

HAVE FUN.  THOSER WHO SEEK TO HARM PEOPLE ARE ADVANCING THEIR CASE.

 

ABORTION's pro-life side is Satan's job and carried out by his team...

Before the Civil War,  Abortion was legal and a woman's choice.  Benjamine Franklyn even published the recipe for an abortion elixir.

Then, after the Civil War, an element of the country wanted revenge on the rest of the nation.  Abortion was outlawed... other things were made against the law... we entered the new century and they came after Alcohol; when that failed, they went after Pot...

They also played the TAX GAME -- exempting themselves and their groups, but hitting the lower segment of the working economy.  this was fun... passing LOOPHOLES that allowed the rich to keep their money and making work for accountants who specialized in tax evasion... as Graduate accounting Professors are known to introduce their course: "This course is about how you keep your ill-gotten gains out of the hands of the tax collector."

We hear that Social Security is running out of money... but it is a pay-as-you-go system and is running out of money because there is a fixed cap on income subject to contributions ... inflation raises incomes, and thus pushes more income past the cap... so no money comes in to pay those who once could live comfortably on even minimum Social Security -- these we have the welfare subsidies and the attacks on those sponging off the system because they are on welfare.

COMICAL ... push people onto welfare with below poverty minimum wages and poverty level Social Security ... then bitch about them...

But that's different from Abortion.  OR IS IT?  A family cannot afford another baby... but they are to give up sex so they don't have any ... or they are held responsible because that 1% failure rate in birth control hit them...

No abortion and we increase deaths due to pregnancy -- EVANGELICALS QUIETLY CHEER that and push to sustain death rates... no death... then poverty and they can bitch about welfare costs... that they have forced higher...  Naturally... it affects minorities more... but that too is part of their game plan.

Evil quietly promotes evil by hiding in among screams about morality...  The moral person would happily support the poor and provide them with medical care -- the way Jesus said to do... but the Evangelicals worship satan... and plan to send everyone to hell... ideally they will fun the incompetent weapons that will bring mass destruction ... waste money there -- never use the money to make the people stronger and more intelligent... only make the economy weaker... as our good Catholic President is doing ... didn't the Catholics provide us with Witch hunts and Inquisitions, Slavery, and mass murders or mindless Crusades?

 

 

  

SCOTUS will make ABORTION UNIVERSAL based on RELIGION

 Abortion Pills  are going to undermine the Evangelicals' push to murder women through the denial of abortion.

YEP!  We already know they want no abortion for any reason -- including saving the life of the mother...which could mean an abortion in the last weeks or days of pregnancy.

However... those who have actually read the Old Testament -- the Book Jesus taught and adhered to -- know that abortion is permitted and even mandated.  In one specific case, the woman is to take an elixir if there is any doubt that the pregnancy is due to her husband and not a third party.

ENTER THE PILL -- it is the modern form of the elixir and therefore is religiously permitted ... and SCOTUS cannot go directly against religious teachings.  Thus, the pill becomes the means of abortion... and, according to scripture, it will fail if GOD determines the baby is to be born.

Can SCOTUS overrule GOD?

Let's see the Evangelicals argue that SCOTUS is more powerful than GOD.  You can bet the hypocrites will try.

BUT... The pill is supported by religion... at least for any who claim adherence to the old testament as part of their teachings -- remember OT includes the Ten Commandments and a few other things which are deemed universal among Christians... so, again, watch the hypocrites consign themselves to eternal damnation (their go-to punishment).

HERE'S SOME FUN STUFF...ON USA BIRTH RATES  The bottom was reached in 1968 at minus 3.69%... the first pause in the increase corresponds to Roe V Wade and the climb followed the right to abort... meaning people decided to have kids... and as the Evangelicals challenged abortion people seem to have decicd to hold off having childre.

HOWEVER.... look at the rate of abortion chart:

With the  ROE V WADE decision, abortions went into decline and are now less than half what they were before 1975.  The Evangelicals are angry about that and the decline of women suffering death or sterilization due to illegal abortions... so they want Roe overturned and the death rates to increase.... along with the number of abortions -- they back this up by opposing medical care and child care...

Constitution SCOTUS possible Abortion Ruling

 "We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, ..., promote the general Welfare, and..."

OK, that's the relevant opening... "General Welfare" is NOT promoted by denial of a medical procedure that would prevent a woman from dying.  Such a death would certainly disrupt "domestic Tranquility" within her family and possibly within the community as a whole.

 According to pro-life Senator Kevin Cramer (R-ND) “Abortion is not about health care and neither is this bill. The right to life is our most precious and fundamental right and this right begins at conception. It is unconscionable and feckless for Democrats to legislate unlimited on demand abortions through all nine months of pregnancy. Not only is this bill an attack on humanity, it is anti-science. I will always stand for the sanctity of life, give a voice to the voiceless, and protect the unborn,”

So we have a question of "LIFE" -- we know the Bible says BIRTHRIGHT begins when the first portion of the fetus exits the womb in a natural way.  So there is no "BIRTHRIGHT" bestowed on a fetus.  Furthermore, if someone attacked the mother and the fetus died, it is to be treated as property and the father is to be compensated for the loss -- it is NOT murder ... at least not according to the Bible.  Moreover, the Bible actually recommends or mandates abortion in several cases... one is when the woman passes off the lover's fetus as her husband's.

Those who wave the Bible condemn their souls by denial of the Bible on this issue.  Look around at all the pro-lifers who volunteer to go to hell for eternal torment.

NEXT is the fetus a "person"?  Constitutionally....NO!

How do we know...?   Take a look at the basis of taxes and apportionment of representatives as originally stated...

"(Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of free Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term of Years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three-fifths of all other Persons.)" 

"whole Number of free Persons" -- if a fetus is a person, the Constitution mandates it be counted as part of the Census enumeration process.  If it is not a person, it does not get counted.  A fetus is NOT counted -- so is not a person or... or the Federal and State governments have illegally omitted them from the enumeration process.  THE SCOTUS MUST DETERMINE THIS QUESTION BEFORE RULING ON ABORTION.  If a fetus is not a person, it is an organic growth -- same as cancer, tumor, cist, or any other medical growth.

Possibly the laws need to be changed to have citizenship start at conception.  That too can get interesting... After all, if a fetus is a person, then it must have citizenship...it must have rights -- and be counted for welfare or other benefits.

Senator Kevin Cramer was quoted saying the fetus was worth the mother's life -- an assertion consistent with pro-lifer since 1973.  However, the Cramer quote has been branded false -- abortion would be allowed for rape, incest, or a threat to the mother's life... the latter could occur in the final days of pregnancy so abortion should be legal up to birth (when the fetus would not be viable -- were it, a C-section, not abortion would be performed.)

Those opposing abortion through the full term are basically saying kill the mother in month nine.

Pro-lifers are PRO-DEATH and that is proven by their opposition to medical care for pregnancy... and a period thereafter.  They love to see babies sick or die for want of medical care ... doubt it?  Ask what law they promote to ensure proper care from conception to a year after birth.  {BOTH mom and child/chldren}

Watch where they are quiet on medical care, housing, and other needs... THEY LIKE HARDSHIP & DEATH ... they want more to witness....