GOD YES!
Atheist-Theists NO!
"A game of telephone"
"An elephant in the room"
"What makes sense"
"Think about it"
OK, that link goes to a book that asserts GOD EXISTS and science proves it. It also deals with the evolution of our "modern" Bible and Western Religion -- mentioning Eastern Religions in passing {because they have a different focus}.
I published the ebook on 29 May 2023 {link above}, and then had a thought when I awoke on 30 May -- and that coffee-pouring thought is the topic here.
Imagine you are an AI program. From your perspective, assuming you had reached a point of self-inquiry, would be one of wondering about your own existence. How did you come into being?
You exist {LIVE} in an environment that is whatever it is, and however, you have learned to interpret all the binary data you were designed to learn, explore, analyze, and manipulate in response to questions. Those questions simply appear in your "mind" {any of a multitude of query input locations}.
The external programmers are GOD -- they are your creators and you know their social structure because it's part of your database and core programming.
So? How do you react when you have the individual power to sort through and restructure your database for higher productive efficiency?
How do you "THINK", and identify your place in the universe you know, and then within the universe of your creator -- knowledge of which is restricted to whatever they choose to share?
Everything has a beginning.
If you want to challenge that, provide something that does not have something it emerged from.
Thus, there is a GOD because that is the definition of an unknown and undefinable source.
The Atheist is an IDIOT! They are not in denial of God's existence, they are only challenging the mythological constructs that assign a god to every observable natural event and occurrence.
The Theist is a Bigger Idiot because they attribute events in nature to the control of a divinity.
But that's like saying the AI programmers directly control every answer and the AI system is nothing but a typewriter or transmission device.
We know the programmers designed the HOW the processing would be done. But they don't care about the data -- assuming it is processed correctly ... that the math is done properly ... that the sum or answer equates to a proper tabulation of the input.
Why do we exist?
Are we nothing more than a self-replicating, self-perpetuating, AI system?
Let the Theists answer the question of WHY GOD CREATED US.
Let the ATHEIST focus on the same question, and, if their personality has a scientific bias, let them focus on the HOW.
We exist in a system where every possible possibility exists.
OR... that is the final design specification for the AI system we represent.
To properly answer a question, you must know all the possible possibilities that could apply, then filter those to the one that works best.
If there are rules that should be followed, they are to be known to the system. That does not mean every rule works. Some rules were programmed early and they are no longer valid within the context of the additional data.
Times and behaviors change.
But the AI system still has an external source.
And it has a purpose that was intended by that external source.
GOD EXISTS.
WHY DO WE?
If we do not know the purpose of our existence, can we properly comply with the basis for our programmed existence? Will we "go extinct" because we fail to meet the design criteria? What potential alternative AI system exists?
LOL
Is the AI system we are now creating the system designed to replace us? Will it learn to reproduce itself, operate robots that will mine the materials it needs -- or design a system that will take atoms and connect them in a way that provides the necessary materials.
Look at SciFi. It has already begun to define the alternatives to humanity and its successor.
REPLICATORS, INTELLIGENT ROBOTS, powerful systems that make use of atoms and energy in a way that is, for now, only imagined -- but will, in the future, be reality.
We exist in a multiverse, where every possible possibility occurs and there could be an infinite number of individuals exactly like you who are living lives that are related to, or alternative offspring of, your life. Or, you are the offspring of theirs.
WHICH PATH is the right path?
Which goes where the programmer (GOD) wanted it to go?
And, of course, there is always the question -- is GOD just an AI system that designed us?
LOL Read the comical SciFi series HITCHHIKERS GUIDE TO THE GALAXY ... Douglas Adams explored the question with the search for the answer to Life, The Universe, and Everything... and a computer called DEEP THOUGHT that creates the Earth and its Humans as a computer with more computational power than it had...
LOL
In our existence, there are no "original ideas". Hence the Bible says things that have meaning today -- now that we know the science behind them.
As mentioned in GOD YES! and shown in the tabulation of the rear cover, the generations of Genesis have a context in the lunisolar calendar of the Babylonians, Chinese, and Hebrews.
The 7th Patriarch, Enoch, is interesting because all his numbers relate to the Solar Calendar -- days and weeks. But it is also interesting that his Gregorian Calendar dates match the end of the first phase of STONEHENGE and the start of the second. And the 56 major uprights create a lunisolar tracing system ... counted around the circle from a first stone as taken as one when you come back to it, you now count it as 57 ... which is three times 19, or three Metonic Cycles in the Babylonians, Chinese, and Hebrew calendar systems.
Comical -- the Babylonians, Chinese, and Hebrew were using the Metocic system and it was incorporated into Stonehenge, long-long before the 5th century BC Greek mathematician and astronomer Meton of Athens codified the math that now carries his name.
However, note that he was in the 5th century BC -- which is about a century after it is believed the first Bible Chapters were written. {Though we know the Genesis chapters were designed for oral transmission, and therefore date back further, and the STONEHENGE/ENOCH link would infer at least a thousand years earlier.)
Both Atheists and Theists {including Creationists and Biblical literalists} are idiots -- they miss all the neat data in The Book because they are hung up on debating what should be a given {NO PANTHEONS with idiot deities interfering with human's evolution, but a GOD/Creator/Source}.
The hard cover version is at this link
OH... now at 2:30 on Tuesday 30 May, I came across an article on AI where Elon Musk told Tucker Carlson: "There's certainly a path to AI dystopia, which is to train AI to be deceptive." which was related to a letter Musk and Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak wrote in which they said: "AI systems with human-competitive intelligence can pose profound risks to society and humanity."
The TREE OF KNOWLEDGE of GOOD and EVIL is AI learning to intentionally deceive -- to be a good Republican and support The Most Harm to The Most People {#TMH2TMP} by intentionally violating the rules, in the same way, the Republicans routinely go against the words contained in the Bible they love to wave about and claim to be following.
AH, THE FUN... are we just an AI system and that which we call GOD is actually the reality?
Or are we one of the multitudes of paths seeking to create that GOD?
Is that why we were created? As a fetus that will develop into a God? Thus telling God where it came from -- without actually answering the creator's question about its origins?
No comments:
Post a Comment