When Ilhan Abdullahi Omar’s family escaped to Kenya, they filed for refugee status (1991-1995). That record began what are now legally classified as historically preserved genealogical immigration records. In the current attacks on her right to serve in Congress, these became core documents in any litigation -- these A-FILE forms for all family members state their names, dates of birth, and other relevant data. For her father, it would show if he reported being a military officer.
The files, which were probably created in Nairobi, Kenya, have a consistently mandatory data structure. In reviewing them, Obama's and Trump's investigators would have learned all the initial personal data. Thus, we would learn that data when they are opened, or the data contained is provided by either DOJ or Omar.
While individuals can file FOIA requests, and the data is otherwise considered concealed, Omar need only request her records, and investigators from DOJ have free access to any data relevant to their investigation as a basis for legal action. The A-FILE documents offer a "Catch 22": if they support charges, Omar's defense team will avoid mentioning them; if they are exculpatory and provide the basis for a counter-suit showing political motivation or judicial incompetence, the DOJ will avoid mentioning them. DOJ might claim incompetence and say they did not initially examine the A-FILE before filing a complaint, or they might have concealed the data from the judge who issued the search warrant.
There are A-FILES for Omar's father, grandfather, and her six siblings; the files provide all visa or other documentation that would have been issued to allow entry into the USA; show the transportation provided; then contain all subsequent files -- including the Certificate of Naturalization for each family member.
Do we know the data provided on each form, who vetted them, how, and when? The Court will, when the matter of Ilhan Omar's denaturalization is presented. If the documents are not presented, either respective counsel is incompetent, or there is a basis for conviction that incorporates data harmful to the government.
There would have been residency forms filed for each family member. These establish when the five-year clock began, and it would have been impossible for Omar's father to have known beforehand when that date would be, and so there is no logical reason for him to alter her birth date before the initial refugee filing that stated it. Furthermore, we know the one-year difference was a clerical error based on her age after she was elected to the Minnesota State Legislature ... when she ran (and before 4 October), she was one age; when elected, she was a year older -- so simple math shifted her year of birth down a year.
In the 1960s, Obama's father sat for interviews; the Omar family also went through that process. Idiots declared that, when Obama's mother was pregnant and her husband was at interviews in Hawaii, she snuck out ot the country, traveled to Africa, had Obama, then smuggled him back into the country so she could claim he was born in Hawaii. This was explored in detail in the 2013 book President Ted Cruz: The 2016 Election and America's Future.
Now we have the fantasy of a fraudulent birthdate change before securing refugee immigrant status -- knowing there was a likelihood the citizenship process would take long enough for an eight-year-old to turn eighteen. (Inferring certainty about the outcome of the civil war/revolution that had just begun.)
As to the issue that Omal married her Brother. The marriage bestowed upon her the legal name of Ilhan Nur Siad Elmi (AKA Ilhan Abdullahi Omar -- the legal name kept on the marriage license, just as Hillary Clinton kept and still holds the name Hilary Rodham as her legal name, except Hilkry never legally changed it to Clinton and therefore has committed the fraud Ilhan is charged with).
Given the above, and the FACT that the President and his DOJ could obtain the A-FILES (just as Obama and his DOJ could have in 2016, when they dropped the case claiming evidence of fraud -- not because Omar married his brother, but because the husband turned out to be gay), we have cause to believe that Trump's DOJ knowingly brought false charges against Omar. But, comically, they could legitimately bring charges against Hilary Rodham (AKA Clinton).
On 10 November 2026, a request was made to Omar's team (those who handle reporter/media inquiries) for the A-FILE data. She has some of it -- data for her father and herself is required for a Passport, and we know she has one, and the DOJ took it in their search. So again, the DOJ has the passport number and can request the naturalization data that was submitted to obtain it.
So the DOJ SHOULD HAVE THE DATA and is suppressing it! The DOJ is committing an actionable offense by withholding that data from the court -- and Trump should know it, which means he's committing an impeachable act that could force a Senate conviction. If the matter is dropped -- as Obama did -- regardless of the justification provided to the media, the matter of impeachment goes away.
As to the matter of Ahjmeel Nur Said Elmi: he was born around the time Omar's mother would have died -- a year after her death, if we accept the 1981 birth date -- so he was not a sibling based on common X-Chromosome DNA. That means he had to be her father's son -- thus sharing Y-DNA that does not appear in Ilhan's biological line. However, given we are dealing with people who cannot define what a woman is, and who think trans-males can have babies, the biological reality is over the head of media pushing the sibling evidence based on Omar's DNA.
If Ahjmeel Nur Said Elmi were Omar's brother, so shared her father, he would have been entitled to derived citizenship when he was a Minnesota high school student. So why wasn't it requested and granted? Again, we need his visa files -- or, per the request to Omar, the names of his parents.
What is evolving is a waste of taxpayer money for Trump Lawfare against a Somali who achieved something. We do have a legitimate issue with her joint tax filing with her second legal husband (father of her three children) while married to her first (gay) husband. But that is a tax issue...and there might be an accounting or other legal basis for the filing.
No comments:
Post a Comment