New York Becoming Largest State to Same-Sex Marriage …

Now that same sex marriage is allowed in New York, there is a new reason for the state, and city, to become Mecca to the creative & Intellectuals in the gay community…

More important, this should go a long way in stemming transmission of STD’s in a significant segment of our society.

Now if the Catholics Clergy would cease and desist their sexual nonsense, we could see a drop in STD’s among what might well be the most promiscuous segment of our society – a group who, if told NO will instinctively insist the answer is YES and run out to do whatever has been forbidden.  Funny thing there, during each of the routine the child molesting priest episodes that periodically get reported, the common statistic is that fully FIFTY PERCENT (50%) of the Catholic Clergy are Homosexual … so there are a lot of gays who still cannot marry and must resort to other ways to relieve their sexual tension.

Remember the guiding test of motive:

“The Most Harm to the Most People”

Gays could always get married – just not to each other.  Those who opposed gay marriage might well wish to see laws saying Jews cannot marry Jews (they did once exist) or laws requiring that Blacks shouldn’t marry Blacks, or Asians marry Asians.  Even better, how about: No Republican can marry a Republican … still better – forbid republicans to marry …. after all, a major segment of their leadership asserts homosexuality is -- just like being in the GOP -- a matter of choice … they have therefore legitimized, or held to be Constitutional, the forbidding marriage based upon free choices in subgroup association.

Any how … a survey of Facebook users had 90% supporting a law pasted by only 53% of the NYS Senate … someone is out of touch.  Just five states currently permit same-sex marriage: Connecticut, Iowa, Massachusetts, New Hampshire and Vermont, as well as the District of Columbia.  And the jury is still out on which of the remaining ones are fully devoted, and committed to, inflicting

“The Most Harm to the Most People”

Reagan’s Most Harm Policy

June 8, 2011 U.S. Is Falling Behind in the Business of ‘Green’ By ELISABETH ROSENTHAL

“If we don’t invest in ways to efficiently produce sustainable energy, then I worry that once we stop importing from the Middle East, we’ll simply find ourselves importing from China.” said Emily Carter, a professor of energy and the environment at Princeton University.

Remember when Ronald Reagan tore the solar collectors off the Carter Whitehouse?  We were on the way to an economy free of dependence of Arab energy and Ronald Reagan and the Republicans said – NO FRIGGIN’ WAY!

“The Most Harm to the Most People”

It takes time to hurt a nation.  It takes time to destroy a major economy.  Ronny was among those who set the forces in motion which would justify our invading under “Desert Storm”; his budget trained Bin Laden; the Bush/Reagan actions begat the Bush jr. policies which threaten to bring about the coming bankruptcy of America.

What shall we do?  The answer is obvious: oppose the creation of wind farms; oppose solar; oppose tidal power; oppose, oppose, oppose.  To ensure this opposition will occur, we need to elect all the Republicans we can – ideally in the mold of Ronald Reagan.

While we are at it, why not cease funding education, and force people to buy health insurance from firms dedicated to finding justifications for the denial of coverage? 

After all, what will make a better America – what other than a sickly and ignorant population?

Remember, for the past sixty odd years, America has made a career of favoring:

“The Most Harm to the Most People”

Why not finish the job?

Lloyd Schofield promotes spread of HIV

“The Most Harm to the Most People” has a new champion of evil: Lloyd Schofield.  He is currently behind a bill to ban circumcision in San Francisco.  Seems to me California was once a base for the spread of HIV-AIDS, and now someone has come forward to ban a procedure which has been demonstrated to impede the spread of HIV and other STD’s. 

“The Most Harm to the Most People” – want to bet this Schofield guy is a Conservative Republican?  Want to bet he promotes the murder of third parties through everything he supports?  That is, third party murder by ensuring that he doesn’t personally know those his positions will kill, injury or somehow torture.

SAN FRANCISCO – Please show you lead the nation in cities that wish the destruction of America.  Please show you are a world leader in promoting “The Most Harm to the Most People.”  Please show you really want to promote the spread of HIV-AIDS in the next generation (the one that will mature in 18 years).  That’s how “The Most Harm to the Most People” works … you do it now and people die later … sufficiently later so you can deny responsibility for your willful acts of torture and murder.

“The Most Harm to the Most People”

The San Francisco Treat

says it ;-D

Running in the red: How the U.S., on the road to surplus, detoured to massive debt

Now, instead of tending a nest egg of more than $2 trillion, the federal government expects to owe more than $10 trillion to outside investors by the end of this year.

The biggest culprit, by far, has been an erosion of tax revenue triggered largely by two recessions and multiple rounds of tax cuts.

Big-ticket spending initiated by the Bush administration accounts for 12 percent of the shift.

Most Republicans reject raising taxes as part of the solution; House Speaker John A. Boehner (Ohio) has called it a “non-starter.”  (of course -- “Most Harm to the Most People” is their number one objective)

NOTE: “The debt ceiling, set at $14.3 trillion, covers all federal debt, including money the Treasury owes other federal entities, such as the Social Security trust fund.”  That is the GHOP has been robbing the SSI Fund to pay for tax cuts to its members… thus achieving a two fold goal – enriching itself while inflicting “The Most Harm to the Most People”.

ANTI-AMERICAN FORCES UNITE … support your local Republican and destroy the American Economy … and, in the process, the lives of your children and grandchildren.

GOP makes my Point

From AP via Washington Post: DAVID ESPO 06/5/11 02:41 PM ET

“The threat of a first-ever default by the federal government is pushing President Barack Obama and Republicans toward a sweeping agreement to cut government spending and increase the Treasury's borrowing authority. Yet a perennial partisan struggle over Medicare drives them apart.”

Note the idea is to increase debt but cut spending – what do they intend to spend the new debt on?  Or, is the idea to cover GOP budget overruns?  That is, to cover doubling of the National Debt caused by the GOP/Bush administration. 

House Democratic leader Rep. Nancy Pelosi of California summed up the GOP objective when she declared: "I could never support any arrangement that reduced benefits for Medicare. Absolutely not!”

We have the Republican trifecta in their attempt to further there “The Most Harm to the Most People” agenda.  They want to provide premium support to the firms that funnel money from our economy to foreign shores; they want  privatization aimed at denial of services and further funneling of money to foreign economies; finally voucherization."  What the hell good are vouchers?  Especially when used to undermine our local schools and send kids to places where they will learn that magical spirits are actively causing changes in species – as opposed to divinely designed evolution.

PLEASE – as a child of the Anti-Nixon Anti-War era – I implore you to support the GOP and, in so doing, do more harm to America than any Jihadist could ever dream of.

Remember, in the 1990’s, Ben Laden declared what he wanted … and immediately after September 11th, George W Bush and the Republican Party made it a point to achieve every one of Ben Laden’s objectives … doubt it? 

Check the historic record (Google the wire services and Arab media reports).  Read Bush’s statements.

Remember, the Bush Administration was proclaiming that Ben Laden was living in a cave – when he was living in luxury a short walk from a military base of operations searching for him.  Also recall, or check, that I said it was illogical:  A man who reportedly needed medical care, and regular dialysis, living in a cave?  And the Billions of USA dollars – appropriated, controlled or administered by Republicans – could not find a 6’6 Arab in a nation of 5’6 people; nor could they follow the movements of a expensive medical device.  Ever wonder why we cannot win the war on drugs?  Same idiots at the helm.  Where does the money really go – all that debt … doubled under Reagan, and again under Bush, and now they want to go yet deeper into debt … where is the money going?

We know – because they want to cut entitlements – that it is NOT going to the needs of the American people.  And … as my previous post explains … it most certainly is NOT being utilized to support local economies – the backbone of the National Economy – through the recognized and undisputed mechanism of the economic multiplier.

Whose pockets are the GOP politicians funneling the money in to?  And why are all those pockets offshore?

“The Most Harm to the Most People”

For it to be achieved, we require a Republican President working with a Republican Congress.

To achieve the 1960’s HIPPY AGENDA – as proclaimed by Richard Milhouse “I am not a crook” Nixon, we need the Republicans  to have more power than they currently have … so they can impose:

“The Most Harm to the Most People”

How it will work

"leveling war" ... wars tend to eliminate people and property -- the property needs to be rebuilt and is done so with the best available technology (in this case, most energy efficient or 'green' technology)  that resets population and damage to environment -- leveling existing distortions.  We will push toward war -- especially in the middle east ... they have not planned for the disappearance of their oil and so have no future revenue stream  ... making them ripe for al Qaeda types.  You'll note al Qaeda moved to the region adjacent to the largest population groups -- nice place to recruit and hide until there is a serious war... at which point there is rapid population depletion.

China's one child policy, with the family bias for males, has produced a male surplus within the military age range -- nobody in the media has mentioned it  ... but the Chinese could field a ground force that could take ten to one losses and still over-run any probable combined military force.  That means any opponents would need to us WMDs rather than troops ... depleting general populations rather quickly.

Those who are drawing from our system for "Entitlements" are actually keeping the society going ... if we had universal healthcare, we would eliminate the depleting economic effect of private insurers and cut real medical costs ... As to entitlements, they are spent locally and therefore play into the economic multiplier effect (every dollar introduced into a healthy local economy circulates seven to ten times before leaving it).  Having to pay for insurance removes funds from the local economy and send them to the insurance company to be invested where there is the highest return -- generally in off shore or outsourced businesses -- erasing that multiplier.  ("The Most Harm to Most People" effect promoted by Bush et al)

Give someone a dollar for entitlement/social security/etc and they spend it locally -- no foreign investment -- it circulates so as to become $7 to $10 of economic growth and eventually reaches banks which invest it in local loans, or it leaves to by the materials that are purchased in local stores.  As each entitlement dollar circulates, it produces tax revenues which bring the cost of entitlement to zero and, in a healthy local economy, generate a surplus tax revenue over and above property taxes.

The baby boomers spend or save for the next generation -- as they pass, the value they accumulate passes to raise standards for next generation ... in terms of property, we need immigration ... people to buy real assets (vacated homes) and add additional productive younger bodies to the economic multiplier cycle.  Immigrants relieve the burden on their own countries and so, effectively, raise the per capita standard of living of of their former country through the act of leaving it.  Once her, as taxpayers, they contribute to Social Security and keep that account healthy.

If we want to hurt the society, first privatize Social Security (had Bush achieved this, stock market & property bubble would have whipped out Social Security plunging nation into real a Depression); second, privatize Healthcare coverage through insurance companies whose motivation is to deny benefits -- thus making the society sick and diverting funds from local economies.  Finally, block immigration and mandate the birth of children who cannot survive, or are unwanted, or are born in to homes which cannot support them -- while cutting funding to education and thus ensuring a non-productive future genberation.

"The Most Harm to Most People" summarized in terms of already well publicized GOP "Conservative" policies.  Also not that the "fiscally responsible" Conservatives -- ala Reagan & Bush each doubled the nationa debt, while the spendthrift Clinton etc administrations generated a surplus.  

What is Personhood & the harm it is intended to promote?

I have often illustrated that the moral and rational objectives of any political act can be reduced to answering the question of which position results in “The Most Harm to the Most People”?

Consider the initiatives being – once again – proposed by those who, under the guise of opposing abortion, wish to redefine personhood as beginning with conception.  Their true agenda is to inflict untold harm on as many people as possible, and impose a condition where moral imperatives will cause the destruction of our society – or, if we are to believe scripture, result in the damnation of the vast majority of “faithful”.

Consider this:
1.  Old Testament Scripture defines birthright as beginning with birth, and the termination of a fetus only counts as murder, if the termination is the result of a brutal assault upon a pregnant woman.  Absent those two conditions, at a time when abortions were common, scriptural law said nothing about the act of abortion being wrong.  Moreover, the New Testament makes no mention of th practice of abortion – which was common in both Hellenistic and Roman society.  It is therefore clear that the source of scripture had no objection to abortion – even abortion which sterilized, or even costed the life of, the mother.  Thus the moral imperative just can’t be supported – especially when it means redefining life as scripturally defined.  Obviously, those who go against scripture are immoral – at least in terms of those who claim scripture as their moral guide and basis for their behavioral mandates.
2.  Defining personhood from conception means issuing a death sentence for a woman who has an  Ectopic pregnancy – which, under any circumstances, cannot be defined as a viable pregnancy.  So the purpose is obviously change then law so as to kill those women.  That is, in North America, 19.7 of every 1,000 pregnancies, or roughly TWO percent of all pregnancies – as is, a single factor which currently accounts for 9% of all pregnancy-related deaths.  The GOAL IS TO KILL one in fifty woman who seek to have a child.  That is the chief objective of individuals like Keith Mason – the individual identified as a driving force behind the current movement.  By having the law changed, Mason and his cohorts can commit mass murder.  CONSIDER the scope: Each year there are approximately 4 million births in the United States; if, for the sake of simplicity, we count them as the only pregnancies, than this change in law will cause EIGHTY THOUSAND deaths annual – or the equivalent of, at least, twenty-nine times the deaths caused al Qaeda on 9/11.  In short, Mason et al are promoting more deaths than Bin Laden could conceive of through any single action, or series of actions.

Then there is the issue of the children produced.
A.  Since only about half of all fertilized eggs  actually result in an ongoing pregnancy, there is an issue as to how we account for those that spontaneously abort.  Do we have a coroner’s inquest for each, so as to determine the cause was “natural” and not “murder”? 
B.  Of those that survive, as we have bestowed personhood, do they now gain legal rights?  Are they citizens?  And if conceived outside of United States territory, are they aliens who must then be naturalized – regardless of the nationality of their parents?  Conversely, are they citizens if concieved in the United States – regardless of whether or not mother was only in transit through US Territory at the time of conception?  Get the feeling we would be clogging the courts with conception cases?  If you do you have realized the 9/11 economic agenda of Mason and his associates – cripple the American economy with necessary legal actions related to citizenship rights.
C. In terms of crippling the economy, there is the matter of healthcare, education and a multitude of other costs associated with children whose parents might, or might not, want to assume support obligations (enforcement again brings the courts & social service agencies into play).  If we wish them to be productive, we need to pay for education – which Mason’s supporters, uniformly, want to decrease.  As to medical costs, Mason’s associates and related politicians, uniformly, want to decrease medicare and medicaid to the point of requiring people to purchase their own medical insurance – meaning that the poor will receive no medical care and will increase in numbers.  This will increase crime and disease – thus, again imposing a Bin Laden style 9/11 economic agenda designed to destroy American society.

The change in “personhood” is therefore both scripturally immoral and a deliberate terrorist act aimed at the destruction of America – by imposing  “The Most Harm to the Most People.”