Hamas admitted Terrorist Organization

When faced with a ‘YES’ or ‘NO’ question, the answer now given declares the opposite answer to be true.  if you do not say ‘Yes’, the Answer is No, and if you do not say ‘No’ the answer is yes – and when you avoid the easily given  moral answer, the immoral is true.

Fox News set of “Hannity”, host Sean Hannity asked his guest,  Yousef Munayyer, a simple question: whether he thinks Hamas is a terrorist organization.  Yousef Munayyer is a Palestinian-American and  executive director of the Jerusalem Fund who makes frequent spokesperson appearances on the various networks.

Obviously, if Munayyer were to affirm that Hamas is a terrorist group, his organization – which is funding  Hamas operations --  would cease to get support.  Moreover, a negative answer would destroy his credibility when reviewed within the context of Iranian funding for Hamas terrorism … which is NOT covert, but is blatantly provided with the full public support of the Iranian Leader.

When he repeated failed to get an answer to a very simple question, Hannity demanded: “What part of this can’t you get through your thick head? Is Hamas a terrorist organization?”

Seeking to give a propaganda speech supporting the complete annihilation of the global Jewish population, and r rather than beginning his response with a simple ‘Yes’ or ‘No’.  Terrorism supporter Munayyer asked: "Do I get to say anything in this conversation?"

Hannity answered., “You get to answer the question; it’s a yes or no question. … you don’t get to filibuster. … Answer, is Hamas a terrorist organization?”

#LetFreedomRing has become Twitter hashtag code for promoting genocide and mass murder by Islamic extremist terrorist organizations who are devoted to inflicting THE MOST HARM TO THE MOST PEOPLE within the Islamic world.

Note their random fire – absence of military strategy – missile attacks on Israel.  Those attacks are designed for the sole purpose and goal of obtaining a violent response guaranteed to kill far more innocent Arabs than they could possibly inflict harm on Israeli military targets.  Obviously, any serious operation aimed at overrunning Israel would first, and exclusively, target both offensive and defensive military facilities – much in the same way Japan attacked Pearl Harbor, but with a planned land incursion follow-up.

NOTE that Hamas doesn’t even seek to create a ground operations force.  There clearly is no military purpose to their attacks – the sole intent is to provoke a violent and deadly  response aimed at the killing of innocents in the same way their terrorist suicide bombers have been targeting Arabs in marketplaces, at Holy Shrine, and in (or on way to) Mosques.

Jihadist Terrorists  want to kill ISA (which is their name for Jesus, or the true Messiah who will whip evildoers from the planet) – they wish to Kill ISA prior to his announcing his birth and presence and leading the true believers in their battle to whip out those individuals who are members of terrorist organizations in both the Arab and Christian worlds.  [European Anti-Semites have same goal toward Jesus].

Answers to Long Standing Questions

“Charting OMER”

Charting The Patriarchs

 “Genesis of Genesis”

“Saint Paul’s Joke”

“Grandpa Was A Deity”

Defining Syrian Rebels

Advance word of the study appears in Monday’s edition of Britain’s Daily Telegraph:
Of the Syrian Rebels: 30,000 to 35,000 are hardline Islamists whose philosophy is similar to the jihadists, but are focused purely on Syria rather than an international revolution; at least a further 30,000 moderates belonging to groups that have an Islamic character.

Some 25,000 to 30,000, belong to secular groups with a democratic or nationalist orientation. In other words, between 25% and 30% of the total rebel force consists of groups considered friendly to the West.
Western diplomats who estimate that less than one third of the opposition forces are “palatable” to Britain, while American envoys put the figure even lower.

The dominant forces among the hardline factions are two Al Qaeda-linked groups, the Al-Nusra Front (Jabhat Al-Nusra) and the Islamic State in Iraq and A-Sham (or Iraq and the Levant).
According to yjr main author of the study is Charles Lister “Because of the Islamist make up of such a large proportion of the opposition, the fear is that if the West doesn’t play its cards right, it will end up pushing these people away from the people we are backing,” he said. “If the West looks as though it is not interested in removing Assad, moderate Islamists are also likely to be pushed further towards extremists.”

HUM – this sounds like exactly what I have been saying here.  If the West assists the Rebels, it is assisting those who hare the West; if it lets them fend for themselves, it is allowing us to get a step closer to the St. Malachy Prophecy and 2035.

“Saint Paul’s Joke” rules the inevitable outcome.  Those who say the are Christians, but ignore the teachings of Jesus, Peter and Paul, (which is 99.99 percent of them) are among those Jesus declared he would not know.  Of course, until they read “Saint Paul’s Joke” they aren’t going to get it.

As for Jews, the Hasidim appear to be among the screwed… they lack the requisite basis - “wisdom, knowledge and understanding” – to understand the scriptures and therefore had better read “Genesis of Genesis”, and to get their dates straight, maybe toss in two subsequent books: “Charting the Patriarchs” and “Charting OMER”.  At least they will then get their dates straight, and learn why the FIRST TEMPLE –- which was designed under King David – wasn’t built until the fourth year in the reign of Solomon … they year, not the King, was the controlling factor; to construct the TEMPLE again, they will need to know the reason it was build at that specific time … thus they can determine when its new foundations are due to be laid out. 

Of course, all the aforementioned books (“Saint Paul’s Joke”, “Genesis of Genesis”, “Charting the Patriarchs”, “Charting OMER”) require people to understand reality – as opposed to being lost in unfounded beliefs … those who prefer pagan beliefs are welcome to become CREATIONIST … they’re doomed anyway.

THE FORWARD hates intelligent comments

Seems the Jewish (once Yiddish) publication, THE FORWARD, has an administrator who opposes scholarly comments on articles – thus, proudly deletes them.

The most recent action was my comments on their review of a new book -- “Zealot: The Life and Times of Jesus of Nazareth” By Reza Aslan, a Religious Scholar, Phd, author, who happens to be Muslim … and seem to have written a book for Random House which discusses the same material which opens my own 2012 book, “Saint Paul’s Joke”.  Specifically, Asian focuses on the history and events associated with the beginnings of the Jesus story.

The reviewer claims: “For the Jesus he finds when the accreted layers of centuries of worship are scraped off is rather different from the one we might be used to, and all the more interesting, human and relevant for that.”

As covered in “Saint Paul’s Joke”, Jesus appears to have been real, human, and a scholar in a line of scholars.  As acknowledged by the reviewer: “Aslan, an Iranian born scholar, surveys the literature around Jesus — what we might know of a man of his time, what the Gospels tell us of his life, what we can discover from contemporary writings and archaeology — and weaves together this material into a highly convincing account of Jesus the man.”  But, in reality, had he read it, the reviewer would have realized that Asian has done little more than what was done in the opening chapters of “Saint Paul’s Joke”.

Is it “preposterous” that Jesus was born in Bethlehem?  On page 39 of “Saint Paul’s Joke”, I pointed out that, “On horse or camel, Bethlehem is a day’s journey from Jerusalem.”   Associating a trip to Jerusalem with the 6bce census was LUKE … who made it a universal requirement that all Jews go to their birth city (as opposed to Tribal area, or identify themselves with their Tribe) …  since there would be a record of such a highly disruptive requirement, it is “preposterous” that they were their as Luke describes.  But Mary was a Kohanim – or so we can assume from her relationship to the parents of John the Baptist … described with the words “thy cousin Elizabeth, she also hath conceived a son in her old age: and this is the sixth month with her that is called barren.”  [cited on page 35 of “Saint Paul’s Joke” as part of Chapter “Birth of a Nazirite”]

Aslan points out, that Jesus would have been able to read or write – an idea which denies the fact he was doubtless a Kohanim who was certainly (via his mother) a cousin to the wife of a Temple Priest who routinely entered the exclusive inner sanctum.  His knowledge of scripture, and explicit quoting of Hillel, indicate he had a better than average education.  Added to which, he was raised in the territory set aside for scholars (we have no real knowledge of Joseph, other than the fact he made a living as a carpenter, but then, the Chief Rabbi of Jerusalem, Hillel, was a woodcutter).  So we can say Asian screwed up of the education bit.

It is pointed out that Jesus “calls himself instead the “son of man”” – that he is mortal, we know the deity element comes in 100 years later … so Asian is OK here.  We are told by the reviewer that “Aslan asks, was Jesus crucified? “If one knew nothing else about Jesus of Nazareth save that he was crucified by Rome, one would know practically all that was needed to uncover who he was and why he ended up nailed to a cross…. His offence… was etched upon a plaque and placed above his head for all to see: Jesus of Nazareth, King of the Jews. His crime was daring to assume kingly ambitions.”” And here is where “Saint Paul’s Joke”  mentions something that Asian avoids concluding – Jesus was KING, or he had the right to assert a lineage that placed him in line for the throne held by the Roman Edomite puppets… Mary ha gotten pregnant while in Jerusalem; Joseph is specific is saying it isn’t his kid, but  for reasons of propriety  -- “political reasons” he would accept her and the child.  Mary might have been raped by Herod – so Jesus was Herod’s son and only Jewish Heir …

Why is this significant?  A) Jesus would be “King of the Jews”, as far as the Jews were concerned; B) it explains the killing of children myth.  NO! No all males were killed (in the Moses mold) by only the Jewish Heirs to the Thrown – we know that Herod killed his sons by the Jewish Queen Miriam … so why not a bastard son by Mary, who was in the line of David and related to an important Temple Priest?

Look at the quote asserted to have hung over the head of Jesus on the cross: “’Jesus of Nazareth, King of the Jews.’ His crime was daring to assume kingly ambitions.”  Now, if we realize that the city of Nazareth does not appear to have existed in the era when Jesus was born (neither archaeological nor official textual evidence exists to show Nazareth existed before 100AD, even a city list by Josephus omits it).  So let’s say the quote refers to something written later from oral history … “Jesus of Nazareth, King of the Jews.”  might have read “Jesus THE NAZERITE, King of the Jews.”  Now it makes sense… John and Jesus were NAZERITE … that is, they were chosen by birth to speak/teach the Words of the Lord… they had a religious calling which was accompanied by intelligence and learning. … if you read, you will discover Sampson was another Nazerite … symbolized by the long hair and sexual abstinence during a specified period of purification/commitment.

The reviewer concludes: “Aslan’s triumph is not in original research or speculation. This is a deft, concise, respectful and accessible summary of — dare I say it? — the truth. It’s a summer afternoon’s read that explains, essentially, how Western civilization came to take the pattern we see today. And it’s hard to think of anyone, really, who wouldn’t benefit from reading it, if willing to accept its message. What’s most surprising is that a story so well accepted by scholars should still come as such a shock to us.”

But, with the exception of Herod (or one of his sons) being the father of Jesus, the same can be said for “Saint Paul’s Joke” …

SO why would The Forward selectively delete comments which agree with, and augment, those of it’s reviewer?

Defense of Marriage Act = illegal

OK, finally … after the dishonesty of 1996, and Clinton’s failure of spine as reflected in his signing of DOMA, rather than issuing a VETO!

If these DOMA characters really wanted to “defend marriage”, they would have declared marriage a religious function and  declared the terms “marriage, married” and any related terms, as they appear in Federal Law,to now refer to Civil Unions Licensed by the States.

A marriage would hence forth be a ceremony officiated over by a religious figure and subject to the laws of the religious institution officiating (Hence, Catholics could not get divorced, Jews would require Rabbinical ‘Get’, etc).

They would also make it clear that Religious marriages are fully subject to religious tribunals, and are outside the jurisdiction of the Civil Courts.  Qualification for any State decreed, or provided, benefits would be available to those joined through Civil Unions, or any Religious marriages, providing they are licensed.  Thus, one can ‘marry’ without filing for a license – but they would have no Federal legal standing.

Failure to adhere to a Religious judgment would be deemed a ‘breech of contract’ and prosecuted in Civil Court by either the religious institution, or respective parties.  Civil Divorce Laws do NOT apply in religious marriages … and cannot be applied in any civil action.

The DOMA people will therefore get what they claim they seek, a declaration that marriage is a Divine Act.

Of course, because the DOMA people are hypocrites and have only harm as their goal, they will reject this.

Saint Paul’s Joke establishes here is no Biblical basis for the rejection of Gay Unions – but there is a clear and explicit basis to reject bi-sexual activities or any act of deception (“passing” or being “in the closet”).

Saint Paul’s Joke also establishes – chapter and verse – that the average Christian violates Romans 2:26 and therefore violates the basis for their religious salvation.

But DOMA people are happy with going to Hell – they just want to take everyone else with them.

Judgment Day – approaching?

In his June 13, 2013 column entitled, "Religion and Inequality", DAVID BROOKS stated: "In the New Testament, Jesus blesses the poor, 'for yours is the kingdom of God.' But 'woe to you who are rich, for you have already received your comfort.'"

He didn't realize it, but he was stating the logic underlying the resignation of Benedict XVI -- who began his retirement plans, and preparing his villa, after Saint Paul's Joke was formally added to the Vatican Archives. Any comfort he would receive would be earthly, because he was destined to join all the other Popes among the rings of Dante's Inferno.

In other news, all the population projections released this past week agree with those inferred by the book's assertion that "all the souls who were ever born" would need to return before an possible 'Judgment Day' -- that is, the current global population would need to equal everyone who ever lived prior to the birth of the oldest person living at that time ... total reincarnation (or resurrection).

Look at the chart.  Now consider the projection in Saint Paul’s Joke that the predicted end-of-days, or Judgment Day, is due between 2034 and 2064.  Recalling that this calculation echoed the one made by Sir Isaac Newton – though via a different method – we can see that the return of all those who ever lived  falls right in the middle of the Judgment Day timeline based upon the mathematics revealed in Genesis of Genesis.

Further analysis would require the projections to be made cumulatively, as opposed to regionalized.  When the total population is at a maximum, the Judgment Day process will begin – we will not know when that is, because we will only know the population is reducing after the reduction begins and has taken effect.

It is only then, in hindsight, that the survivors will see that there were indications.  The population will then continue to shrink, it will be necessary for it to contract to the sustainable levels of a global paradise… and it will be global – it is the Davidic Prophecy.

Saint Paul’s Joke

Kindle Edition of Saint Paul’s Joke ($6.00)is available at http://www.amazon.com/dp/B009DVS4QE

Print Edition of Saint Paul’s Joke ($14.95) is available at http://www.amazon.com/Saint-Pauls-Joke-Punch-Killer/dp/1469953919

Vatican Archivist sent a nice Thank You – dated 4 September 2012 for the two copies that they had requested – which were send in July.

This is probably the only chance for those who believe in Christian Resurrection to make sure they meet the basic requirements.  It seems Fortunate, for many of us, that most Christians are really anti-Christs … they just will not learn that before they stand before the Judgment Bar.  Though they should have realized it from reading the Gospels.  Comical aspect, those who never read the Gospels  actually have an advantage in gaining salvation.

I love it

Bible thinking

_____________________________________________________
Date Line May 10, 2007

When you were a child, you thought as a child. Who are the children?

One of the delights of life is Christian baiting and Christian bashing. There are a few who have the wisdom, knowledge and understanding necessary to afford themselves the right to be; but for the majority, there has been no change since the earliest period of superstition.

Today, I will focus on the Resurrection. If you come to it as a matter of faith, and belief in the unnatural, you come as antithesis of the all you profess to subscribe to. If you assert it was of this world in accordance with that neverland where nature originated; ah yes.

The Bible, the New Testiment, the oft translated, retranslated, edited and reedited work for which no original has been found, is the source of all. As we are not concerned with those chapters known to have been mistranslated, or intentionally changed, we have it easy.

What did the authors of the NEW version wish to have their readers understand and believe (in terms of Resurrection)? Were they talking about an event OF the natural world or the supernatural?

There was an affliction. Something which mimics death. Something for which there is a cure. Something which might be unique to the early farm regions, but which is not known beyond.

What is it? What slows the metabolism to imperceptible levels? What might not have been noticed as life to the untrained, but today might not even be seen, or thought of, as “death”.

Today we think of death as cessation of brain activity, the body is often killed so that the medical problem can be cured. The body is meaningless. Isn’t that what the New Book says?

What disease can “kill” the body, but leave the mind alive?

Date Line May 13, 2007
Ah yes, the thought ended and did not resume. Thinking through the scriptures, like thinking about the two versions of Moses: the first inferring he was a first born to a father who was not a Levite; and the second representing him as the second son to the parents of Aaron.

Thinking. Genetically was Moses a full sibling, or a half-sibling, to Aaron? There is a significance. A genetic one.

We know the DNA of those who are Cohanim; but it is not the DNA of the Levites. There are two ways to read that and each hinges on the mother and how many fathers.

I suspect, given the evidence of the rest of the text, that Moses was a Hyksos. Aaron was, for want of another term, a Bedouin. But their mother was a Levite and so they were both of the tribe of Levy.

The curiosity would be the discovery of the DNA for the Hyksos kings who ruled Egypt during the period associated with the Biblical period in which they “knew Joseph”; and ending with the period in which a Pharaoh came who did not know him.

There is another thing wandering my brain: When Abraham arrived in Egypt with Sarah, his wife, and passed her off as his sister, Pharaoh welcomed him to court. Pharaoh was smitten by Sarah’s beauty and wanted her.

We are told a deity came to Pharaoh in a dream and informed him that Sarah was the wife of Abraham, not the sister. Pharaoh becomes upset and infers, based on them having the SAME deity, that he would need to answer to their common deity for coveting his neighbors wife.

Abraham had feared acknowledging Sarah as his wife would have him killed. That infers a different deity, or cultural heritage, which made the coveting of the wife of another man acceptable; and that killing the husband to obtain the wife was also the norm.

What people of Egypt would have the same deity as Canaanites? What deity was in Canaan which was also in Egypt? Where did the rules, the commandments come from?

Clearly they were in place long before Moses. What Code of Laws is there available to us to compare to as the origin of Laws of Moses? _____________________________________________________

The Lost Tomb of Jesus - Media Bullshit 101

_____________________________________________________
Date Line March 3, 2007

Media hype 101 – if reality is too hard to deal with, cover fantasy and non-issues. So it is that we have been engulfed in the trials and tribulations of Anna Nicole Smith and the supposed Tomb of Jesus.

Anna got her tomb and a royal sendoff. For someone typified in numerous articles as a “B actress”, stripper and billionaire’s widow, this multimillionaire seemed to have done quite well for herself.

If it were only that here detractors were not praying they too could have been so successful, there might have been a reason to spread all that ink. “Whoever dies with the most toys wins”– Anna won well.
_____________________________________________________
Date Line March 3, 2007

Now we have the story closest to my heart – the idea that there is a basis for a documentary proclaiming to have the tomb of Jesus and his family.

Oh shades of “The Da Vinci Code” – are we to believe that there is really a tomb and that we now know the mtDNA of Mary the wife, and Mary the mother? Oh so cute.

Oh how cute is the idea that this revelation would stand religion on its head; the idea that Jews would be upset over the known association of Jesus – the Rabbi – to the Jewish community of the first three centuries in our western calendar; the idea that Christians would be bent out of shape to discover they follow superstitious myth when there is fact to be had. Oh the poor fools fear being proved the fool.

A few facts to shape the argument that isn’t:
1. The yDNA is either mortal or divine – and nobody can retrieve it, so nobody knows what it might tell us.
2. That there is DNA tells nothing of who owned it. Are the relics of Jesus’ blood? If they were to exist, would they been tested? And if tested, positive results – clades, SNP’s, DYS markers, haplotypes and haplogroups would be revealed; thus proving the myths to be just that.
3. If we have mtDNA, whose is it? What basis of comparison exists for that? It is like “The Da Vinci Code”, but with the exception that there is no continuous 2000 year paper trail to accompany the bones.

Look at the argument used to denounce:
1. The box said “Jesus son of Joseph; the rebuttal is that the followers called him Jesus son of Mary. Idiots! Where is Joseph mentioned in the events of the cross? Was Joseph alive? We know of the mother, the brothers and sisters – but where the father? Would not the followers know Jesus by the woman who was with him, not but a father unknown to them.
2. The box said “Jesus son of Joseph; sons were identified by their deeds or by their father. It is natural for this to be the message on the tomb.
3. To say that Jesus was not known via his father Joseph is to show ignorance of the scriptural text, wherein does it not have the query: “Is this not the carpenter’s son?” Where Joseph was known, thus was identified Jesus.
4. The idea of a tomb, which denotes a person and family of means and reputation, has caused complaint. But think about our society – are not contractors among the successful? A carpenter was a skilled trade with special tools (and lacking hardware stores, or Industrial Arts classes in schools there were few amateurs in contracting and the construction fields). Why couldn’t Joseph have afforded a tomb?

The denunciations, and media hype, are simpleminded games targeted at simple minded people, with the hope of creating the buzz needed to make the documentary profitable.

The reality is? There is no basis in evidence or fact to make the link in a way which would threaten the superstitious beliefs held so dear by fools. However, the failure to produce the DNA results cheats the academic community of a vital tool in identifying the historic origins and associations of the people of the period.

Imagine if the DNA belonged to an African, an Egyptian, and not a Jew? Suddenly there is a real reason not to publish the results.
_____________________________________________________