"In some polls of the Republican presidential field, Mr Trump and Mr Cruz share half of all supporters between them. At home they hint that the government is bent on harming Americans. Abroad, they seem happy to let their country be seen as xenophobic—though it is hard to see how IS will ever be beaten without Muslim allies. At a moment of public panic, both are behaving with a rare cynicism. Even if voters eventually rebuff their fear-mongering, this election will leave scars."
I wish I had written that in "Death Over Life: A Prophecy of America's Destruction"
But Last year, the focus was on the prophecy and the coincidence of dates that needed to be tested to establish the validity of the theory.
But now we have moved to another level -- the events are unfolding and others are filling in the details. In the case of the cited quote, an article in THE ECONOMIST http://www.economist.com/node/21679800/print ![]()
Moving on, MediaMatters points out: "CNN Leaves Anti-Choice Domestic Terrorism Out Of GOP's National Security Debate". And states: "CNN moderators failed to ask the Republican presidential primary candidates about the deadly shooting attack at a Colorado Springs Planned Parenthood, which has been linked by many in the media to heated anti-Planned Parenthood rhetoric from the GOP."
When you are intentionally feeding the public rhetoric that ISIS requires to achieve a strengthening of its position as a global power, you do not point that reality out to the rubes you are conning.
If all the horrors of the daily murders of children in America can be associated with ISIS, then there will be little difficulty convincing Americans to, once again, invade the Middle East and, this time, to use the "Holy War" Crusader rhetoric which Bush 43 attempted to utilize and was chastised for.
Attack Muslim's for being Muslim and you validate the Koran teaching that ISIS has been trying to sell. You also validate the end-of-times scenarios that the right-wing evangelicals have been promoting since the 1950's.
As the article points out, the attack on the Planned Parenthood clinic did NOT come "out of the blue"; nor did the ranting about "baby parts" which accompanied the murderer's proud confession of his actions -- a confession which many tweeted were the words of a heroic individual "saving the lives of fetuses'.
But those are the same Fetus that are denied healthcare, their mothers berated as "Welfare Queens" and told they should not have the child they cannot afford to raise. ... they should not have it, but they should not NOT have it. But that is, after all, the logic which has marked all the debates and which will define the Republican Campaign rhetoric for the next ten months.
Be warned: When the Convention settles on a candidate -- it will NOT be Donald Trump or Ted Cruz, but more likely Jeb Bush because of his family pattern of waging war in the Middle East -- that candidate shall be a HAWK. He will seem to be either losing or unable to attain, the popular vote, so in September 2016 ISIS shall wage a terrorist attack in a form that assures voter outrage and demands for retaliation.
Where will that attack occur? At this point, it is hard to judge. But, loving prophecy and having written about it in "SAINT PAUL'S JOKE", it would seem that an attack on the Vatican would be just the thing. Never mind the Catholic versus other Christians, the Vatican is the living symbol of Christian origins -- thus, a WTC attack on it would achieve the mutual goal of both ISIS and the Right-Wing Conservative Republicans.
A YouTube statement by
A YouTube statement by
No comments:
Post a Comment