"The proposed legislation, House Bill 565, seeks to extend in Ohio's criminal code the definition of a person to include "unborn" humans. This would be done by calling for the "abolition of abortion in the state of Ohio and the protection of unborn humans."
If passed, the bill would categorize a fetus, from conception, as a person, which could leave those who undergo or perform abortions open to facing severe criminal penalties that could equate abortion with murder."
Florida Law professor Mary Ziegler, was quoted saying 'House Bill 565 "doesn't actually say that women would get the death penalty," it does "treat abortion as homicide and pretty clearly includes women having abortions among people who could be punished for having abortions."'
Thus women obtaining abortions are to be charged with homicide -- probably as willing accessories to it -- while Doctors would be the murders and Nurses and facility administrators accessories to the crime.
Then we go to the next level of "fun and games" -- "The law of unintended consequences is a frequently observed phenomenon in which any action has results that are not part of the actor's purpose."
If a fetus is a PERSON, then they must be counted as part of the population and so must appear in the State and Federal Census data.
If they are a person, are they a "Natural Citizen" (not yet born, they cannot be a "Natural Born Citizen" but if conceived in the United States then born elsewhere, would they carry the "BORN" in conjunction with their "Natural Citizenship".
Then comes the issue of conception -- where were they conceived?
Sounds silly, but, when they have been deemed a person, their place of conception and related citizenship would seem to exclude them from being "ANCHOR BABIES" if conceived outside the U.S. BORDERS -- it would simply make them smuggled in illegals or undocumented.
One might even say the fetus is a slave -- because it had no say in the action.
No comments:
Post a Comment