Impeach Obama Ad … published by those committing treason

Read the ad ... the impeachable action is NOT that of Obama, but the Republicans:   The act in question is the shutdown of the government through blackmail -- the demand to defund a working program which benefits Americans and which has been signed on to by Republican Governors across America because it helps their states ... failure to meet that demand results in putting 800,000 Government employees out of work and denying them the means to meet their expenses.  Military, Weather (storm warnings), and quasi-emergency services -- including, but not limited to, cancer treatment for children -- are all being blocked by the blackmailers.  This is an attack by the Tea Party on the American Citizen and Obama is fighting against it.  Thus, only criminals, or those seeking to destroy America, would support the defunding demand, or allege an impeachment basis against Obama.

Tea Party Republicans attack and try to destroy America by closing it down (clearly an act of HIGH TREASON); so we need to impeach the man who is trying to stop them... Now that is good sound Tea Party Logic... " St. Paul's Joke " ... the Tea party represents the idiots who don't get it (hence are spiritually doomed).

Read “Saint Paul’s Joke” and find out what the obligation is … or read the parable  of the Good Samaritan begin and learn what the Christian and Jewish obligation to the sick entails.  The Tea Party is clearly opposed to that teaching of Jesus, so it might not be too out of line to say they represent the modern anti-Christs who will bring about the apocalypse. 

Countdown to 2034/5  

Wants To Ban Circumcision

In Denmark, Leftist Social Liberals Cite Children's Rights as the basis for a ban on circumcision.  If we carry their logic further, just a bit, all vaccination like procedures violate a child’s rights.  For that matter, forcing them to wear clothing also violates their rights.

The Social Democrats party, a left-wing Danish political party is seeking to outlaw ritual circumcision in Denmark. The fact that they are targeting a RITUAL act means we can ignore the idea of it being expanded to medical procedures –-- though it could be argued that clothes are a ritual element.

On the other hand,  Lene Rachel Andersen, a Danish Jewish author and journalist, said, in an Op-Ed following the August 15 vote, that  any ban would mean the demise of Danish Jewry, and that “within two to three years, religious Jews will move away move from Denmark.”

Of course, if religious Jews demonstrated the intelligence Jews are noted for, they would turn to their doctors and the procedure would continue as a medical one – akin to vaccination – utilized to prevent the child, as an adult, from contracting an STD.  If nothing else, the procedure has been proved to reduce the likelihood of contracting an STD (it isn’t 100% effective, but is as effective as many of the common medical practices, such as contraception and vaccination).

The practice would be conducted on the the eighth day – the first day when the clotting factor is finally established in a infant.  Simply put, the ritual becomes medical and the ‘RITUAL BAN’ becomes meaningless – unless you count the lack of a non-medical Mohel.  But, in reality, given the occurrence of disease transfer which has recently been reported, the circumcision should be carried out by a medical professional.  There is absolutely NOTHING in scripture which prohibits a doctor from performing the circumcision, or which mandates that a specific person perform it.  At best, given that the ritual was mandated to a father to perform on his son, the Mohel is, in reality, a violation of the literal mandate.

If anti-Semites wish to ban a ritual – they cannot ban a practice.  But, in accordance with “Saint Paul’s Joke”, they define themselves as anti-Christ in terms of Paul.  We already know that any violation of LAW is directly opposed to the mandates of Jesus and Peter. This means they and all their followers are screwed – at least, if we go to war by 2035.

JUCHE: tenth most widely followed religion in the world.

From a sociological viewpoint, its 19m followers make JUCHE, the national ideology of North Korea, clearly a religion.  It has a comprehensive belief system, has holy places, and distinctive customs... moreover, it displaces other religions.  It does not take a sociological genius to see that the cult of the North Korean state's founder, Kim Il Sung, and of his son and successor Kim Jong Il, who ruled from 1994 to 2011, shares many features with established creeds. (claims Thomas J Belke, an American Protestant theologian)

The founder is a kind of god, and his successor as the "son of a god"—a formula that is every bit a valid as Christian theology … with the exception that we can prove these individuals lived.  More important, unlike Christianity, the North Koreans seem to actually follow the laws their deity sets down.  As we know, Christians are ordered, by Jesus, Peter, James and Paul,  to follow the Torah Laws – they are to avoid pork, shell fish, blood and fat.  When have you ever met a Christian who avoided these for religious (as opposed to medical) reasons?

Looking at Christian history, we see they would convert, or kill,   Jesus, Peter, James and Paul, for NOT abandoning their  Torah.  It is the key to the Inquisition and the now abandoned prayer for the conversion of the Jews.

The core principle of JUCHE is self-reliance: the idea that North Korea is under perpetual threat and must therefore pursue economic and military self-sufficiency so as to survive – and the greater the threat to the nation, the greater its need for a supernatural protector.

Mr Belke, the Protestant theologian, is more struck by the utter contrast between juche and Christianity, which spread throughout Korea in the early 20th century, thrives in the South and still survives in underground pockets in the North. In his view, the very existence of Christianity is a threat to the Kims because "nothing undermines totalitarianism more than the idea that the ruler, like everybody else, is accountable to God."

Read the ECONOMIST article,  then do your own research – or, as the Vatican did, read “SAINT PAUL’S JOKE” and discover why Benedict XVI had to resign, and why Pope Francis I is being so friendly to the Jews..

More support for Malachy

SAINT PAUL’S JOKE speaks to the prophecy that Italy – specifically ROME – will be destroyed.  Now we have a fundamentalist based logic for that destruction and the end of the Vatican.

Article by Giulio Meotti, Italy EXPOSÉ: Italy, Land of Islam … “Last week Italian education minister Francesco Profumo proposed that Islam be taught in public schools alongside the traditional teaching of Catholicism, while Bishop Mariano Crociata, secretary general of the Italian Episcopal Conference, announced that the Vatican is in favor of building new mosques in Italy.”

Meotti provides these facts: “Twenty-nine of the suicide bombers in Iraq and Afghanistan came from Italy.” & “Eight of the terrorists jailed in Guantanamo Bay are Italians.”

“Young children are disappearing from Italy. According to the U.N.'s Population Division, by 2050 they will account for a mere 2.8% of the Italian population. "Democracies are governed by demography”, explained James Vaupel, director of the Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research in Germany. “If birth rates stay low, Italy’s population could be 10 million at the end of the twenty-first century”, a sixth of the population today”

Now consider, SAINT PAUL’S JOKE contains a timel8ine which begins on 21 December (two months from now) and ends in 2064.  The demographic decline falls in 2050 … and we can expect it to be echoed around the world… wherever negative or zero population growth prevail.  To that decline we can add negative effects from natural disasters.  All begin within two months.

The fun aspect will be the effect the election has on America’s place in prophecy.  The children of Moses were black (their mother an Ethiopian) … Mormons are traditionally racist … does that mean anything?

Anti-Allah … Anti-Mohammed

In Nigeria we find the typical anti-Allah, anti-Islam, organization.  It is called Boko Haram, and claims to represent Islam  … but represents militants who are immoral and deliberately violate the Koran.

Recently, they organized a suicidal Church bombing.  But attacks on Christians are only authorized AFTER Isa returns.  And then, only against evil Christians.

Suicide is forbidden… self-sacrifice is acceptable.  the difference is basic, in suicide you knowingly go into a situation with the intent to die.  You also, as in the Nigeria instance, or the attack on the World Trade Center, seek to murder innocents – which is also forbidden.

Evil leaders, priests, who are supposed to enforce the Koran’s teachings show their anti-Islam posture by making up rhetorical justifications for violations.

As we see in SAINT PAUL’S JOKE, Rome is due to be destroyed, within the next generation.  The Book of Revelation – some translations – identify the Church of Rome as the Church of Satan.  An Irish Monk, 1000 years ago, predicted all the Popes, including the next & last one – Petros – who will oversee Rome’s demise in a period of tribulation.  Will he finally be wrong?

If he is not, then it follows that the Islamic prophecy is to be fulfilled then – without the aid of these evil people, who will fall with the rest of the evil ones … and that their families and supporters with them.

Of course, those who do not believe in religion – like the Islamic Militants who has dem9onstrated their disdain for the Koran – shall ignore the warning.  It is, in the end, SAINT PAUL’S JOKE.  What is written vs what is practiced in the name of that which was never written, or intended.

The Church dies, the militants die, they all fail the final judgment.  Or, there is no judgment and they are doing what is allowed – because there is no deity to set the rules.  So, there is no reason for us.

THE MOST HARM TO THE MOST PEOPLE  

Forced Conversion

A December 26th news story mentions that Egyptian Christians have accused Muslims of abducting the women and forcing them to convert.  Now this is something that Christian and Muslims have been engaged in for around fifteen centuries.  If we put aside the abducting of women – which is a direct violation of the Koran and therefore proves the Muslim’s are just criminals born to the Islamic religion - What’s the big deal?

Forced conversion is a bit of a joke.  You cannot force conversion – from a religious viewpoint it is irrational and therefore makes it clear that those engaged in the practice are themselves irrational.

Consider this: if two individuals, who wish to reach a common destination, are, by chance, walking down a road and come to a fork in that road … one looks to the left, one to the right, and both BELIEVE they are looking down the proper/correct fork … what is their proper action?

Should they argue over which road leads to the desired destination?  Should one force the other to take and travel THEIR fork?  Or should they each journey as they will with the one who was right achieving their goal of arriving to the destination?  What if the general destination is the same, but different specific locations are sought?  (Two Egyptians heading to the Americas – one to North, the other to South. Or to the United States and one to Maine the other Florida – same government, different state jurisdictions.)

What if both roads go to that destination – and neither has made the wrong choice?  What if neither road gets them there and both their beliefs were wrong?  But to keep it simple, let us assume one is right and the other wrong.  Will the one who is forced be grateful that they have been brought kicking and screaming to the destination?  And what if they have been brought, kicking and screaming, down the wrong road – what response are they entitled to, what punishment can they bestow upon their abductor? 

Now, what if that destination only admits those who came willingly, and what if it also bars admission to those who force others to come there?

In terms of theology – is it valid to bring someone where they do not wish to be?  If so, could not Satan grab souls off the street in the same way the Muslims grab Christian women?  Or the same way Mormons retroactively seal deceased ancestors into a religion which, during the ancestor’s life, the ancestor did not know, nor would have had any interest in knowing?

It is interesting that Al-Qaida in Iraq turned the desire of the women to revert to their faith into a cause celebre when it cited the women as the reason behind a Baghdad church siege.  NOTE that Al-Qaida murderers – those who violate the Koran by killing innocents – are championing the validity of forced conversion.  Those who, by their nature and base doctrine, violate every basic tenet of every known religion, are the ones who are at the forefront in the support of forced conversion.  Just goes to show what the true purpose and value of the underlying religion is … pure evil and mutually assured spiritual destruction.

GOP WANTS MORE ABORTIONS

Yep, that's the facts. The GOP WANTS there to be more abortions -- that's why they oppose Health Care Reform.
Check this from "Sunday, March 14, 2010 news report: "Increasing health-care coverage is one of the most powerful tools for reducing the number of abortions -- a fact proved by years of experience in other industrialized nations. All the other advanced, free-market democracies provide health-care coverage for everybody. And all of them have lower rates of abortion than does the United States."

Now think about it:
1. Roe v Wade legalizes abortion and the per capita rate of abortions DECREASED significantly. More important, all those women who would have died, or become sterile, from illegal abortions were thereafter able to live and have children when they were ready for them. GOP wanted these women dead! That's why they actively oppose legal abortion.
2. The GOP wants more abortions -- which is why they oppose birth control and sex education ... arguing for abstinence policies they know will not, do not, work in practice.
3. Opposition to birth control includes opposition to condoms -- which prevent the spread of STDs and therefore the spread of HIV. The GOP wants you to die! They want the spread of STDs and HIV. They are the agents of death sitting on their Death Panels in state and federal legislatures.

REALITY CHECK:
"The U.N. data measure the number of abortions for women ages 15 to 44. They show that Canada, for example, has 15.2 abortions per 1,000 women; Denmark, 14.3; Germany, 7.8; Japan, 12.3; Britain, 17.0; and the United States, 20.8. When it comes to abortion rates in the developed world, we're No. 1."

We are number one in abortions because the GOP and Evangelicals WANT ABORTION! They want women to abort with coat hangers, become sterile or die. They want that -- because they actively oppose policies which will decrease or prevent those outcomes.

That's also why they oppose single payer health care ... if you can get good, safe, timely treatment -- you'll live a long and healthy life ... the GOP & Evangelicals wants you dead.
As for the evangelicals ... remember: Jesus COMMANDED that you provide health care to those who need it ... he did not command that you make them buy insurance or pay car for themselves. The GOP & Evangelicals are ANTI-CHRIST.

Go ahead ... argue otherwise ... the facts and numbers are against you.

===================================================

Doubt that the GOP hate syou and is anti-American?
Think about this:
A. Reagan doubles the national debt -- you got nothing to show for it; and Reagan supporters go to export your jobs and, in the process, reduce their taxes on money made here.
B. Bush yells Social Security is in trouble -- his answer is to privatize it and take fiscal actions which caused the markets to fail and the current recession.
C. Bush yells Social Security is in trouble -- his answer is to redouble the national debt ... effectively spending several times that which would be necessary to ensure the stolidity and fiscal soundness of Social Security. What did you get? Your children are now so far in debt that they could never support both the National Debt and You! The GOP wants it that way ... they have proved it with both Reagan & Bush ... they have proved it with their Borrow and Spend, Borrow and Spend, Borrow and Spend, Borrow and Spend, ... and yes ... Borrow and Spend policies.

You need not believe me ... you've been told and therefore it is on your head. When the Social Security Admin9stration goes bust ... when the Federal Government uses inflation to reduce the debt -- and the value of your savings, ... if you manage to have any.