WHY TEA PARTY OPPOSES ACA

Now we know why the Tea Party opposes ACA "Obamacare, [Republican Tom Scully] said, was largely based on past Republican initiatives. “If you took George H. W. Bush’s health plan and removed the label, you’d think it was Obamacare.”  And he should know!

Scully was a principal health policy adviser under President George H. W. Bush, he helped formulate many of those past Republican initiatives — like the shift to private-insurance programs — that Obamacare has put into law. Under George W. Bush, he ran the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and oversaw a host of proto-Obamacare reforms, like Medicare Part D, which introduced competition into the government-supported health care market.

To really gain power – the power to destroy America – The Tea Party needs to discredit the Republican Old Guard policies.  Now they are faced with one of those policies being passed into law under a black Democratic President.  RACE IS A FACTOR which underlies the heart of The Tea Party base.  It doesn’t matter if both their policies and objectives will destroy that base … after all, did Hitler care that Germany would be destroyed by driving its best minds away and into the enemy research facilities?  Of course not.  Hitler was playing on ancestral hatreds, in the same way the Tea Party is relying on those hatreds to protect it from having to deliver specifics about what they deem objectionable in providing health care to their base.

Scully, who is working hard to profit from ACA, liked the market-driven private-insurance exchanges, but he detested that the law called for hundreds of billions of dollars in future subsidies to help Americans, including certain families earning up to about $95,000, buy insurance.  Scully isn’t opposed to the programs, or the law, he just fears that rapid transfer of so much money from other parts of the economy could have a negative overall effect. “It’s way too much money, way too fast,” he said. “But it’s going to be great for you investors.”

Partly obscured by the debate about coverage is the fact that the Affordable Care Act created the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation, a sort of health care innovation incubator that funds companies as they explore new ways of delivering quality care more cheaply.  Note that this means there will be a degree of mandated coverage for “experimental procedures” that old policies exclude.  As a result, those policies need to be canceled and new policies which take advantage of the new – extended -- care.

The Tea Party has followed the agenda set down by al-Qaeda … right up to and including the recent vote by 162 elected representatives to default on lawful debts and send the nation into bankruptcy.

Now, beginning January 1st 2014, they will attempt to complete that objective.

THE MOST HARM TO THE MOST PEOPLE

IT IS THEIR ONLY TRUE OBJECTIVE

CONSIDER THEIR NEXT STEP:

Ted Cruz for President.  He's a "natural-born Canadian"   He is ! NOT ! a "natural-born Citizen of the United Sates" ... his citizenship is DERIVED from his mother under a statutory provision which grants naturalization to the children of American Citizens born in other nations.  A Cruz Presidency, or vice-Presidency, would be blatantly unconstitutional -- which is the reason The Tea Party will promote it.  Should Cruz manage to get so far as to prove the ignorance of the average voter and thus be elected, there would be a statutory basis from throwing the nation into Chaos!  All al Qaeda needs is to have the orderly process of government disrupted.  So long as they do NOT attack the United States, they will be free to attack any and all other nations.  America would be in the position of having to resolve the chain of command -- to determine who is the LAWFUL Commander-in-Chief.  Who should the military take orders from, when the whole election is thrown into question?

 2017 becomes a critical year in history -- a year when horrors might befall Europe and the Global Economy... and The Tea Party is a significant element in bringing about the next great era of destruction.

SAINT PAUL'S JOKE

It's only three years from clarity.

Government subsidized salaries

“A single 300-person Walmart Supercenter store in Wisconsin likely costs taxpayers at least $904,542 per year.”  Nice Statistic – one that reflects the Federal Benefits provided because the workers are underpaid.  Thus Walmart profits are basically the result of stealing from the Federal government – they steal the money that should go to paying a living wage to their workers… and compared to online pricing, and related costs of shopping, Walmart isn’t cheap.

Wouldn’t it be nice if certain employers actually paid a living wage – one high enough to keep its people off food stamps?

Tea Party Salesmen (ala Castro & Hitler)

Watching the Tea Party supporters, and reading their irrational rants against Obama and “Liberals” reminds me of those who supported Castro in Cuba (like Ted Cruz’s dad) and Hitler in 1930’s Germany.

Check there words.  Where is the assertion of a positive benefit for their own group?  How do THEY [the Tea Party rank & file voters] gain anything?

Does the Tea Party promise healthcare, better education, a better lifestyle, or some improvement to their standard of living and future economic security?

The answer is an obvious, and resounding, NO!

There is a vague idea that the deficit should be cut, but the companion idea is to reduce the Treasury income (Tax Revenues) needed to pay it off.  Instead we hear of spending cuts – generally  to the very social programs which have served to increase the American condition and distinguish it from third world nations … programs which make us either competitive with, or superior to, our economic competition.

They do not cut military spending – especially spending in foreign nations … spending that removes capital from our economy and injects it into the foreign GDP.

Hitler didn’t offer anything – he opposed, he blamed, he attacked the Jews and blamed them in the same way the Tea Party attacks the liberals [generally associated with both Jews and Blacks, but seldom with Christians – though the teachings of Jesus were devoutly liberal]

When Rafael Cruz fought with Castro, like most fighters of his age, he was fighting against the government – he was not fighting for Communism … at least that is what he now claims.  But, when Cruz Sr. came to America and availed himself of our educational system,  he wasn’t interested in fighting against Communism … instead we know he escaped to Canada rather than be subject to the 1960’s Vietnam Draft.  His son Ted was born in Canada ... is a natural born citizen of Canada; as such, is disqualified from the occupying the White House.

The pattern was simple, Rafael Cruz fought against, he did not fight for anything, and he taught his son that people will fight against anything – even their own best interest.  The matter is just one of phrasing it to conform to their prejudice – in the same way Hitler did.  His son is smart: he graduated Princeton, then magna cum laude from Harvard Law School.   He knows how to phrase a lie.

The Tea Party is against liberals [code for blacks & Jews], and they oppose freedom which comes from education and good health.  They oppose anything which betters the human condition.  If you doubt that, try to itemize programs they advocate which help the average person.

THERE ARE NONE!

The Tea Party will not advocate anything which fails to line the pockets of their elite with platinum… though they often settle for gold and silver.

Destroy the environment, YES they will do that.  Make life harder for those who do basic jobs, YES they will do that.  Take food from the hungry, leave the sick to die in the streets … they will do that to … though they will also make a big show of assisting the hungry and poor – if it allows them to solicit money to build their mansions.

the Tea Party does not stand FOR anything; but they do stand AGAINST everything that will in any way help make you, and your children, safer and more secure.

Of course, like Hitler, the Tea Party will only be seen for what it is after the harm is done.  Usually fifteen or 20 or 25 years after they come to power.  Funny thing, Hitler was an Austrian citizen until 7 April 1925, and became a German citizen after 25 February 1932 [renounced the former to officially be the latter then became Chancellor] … so he too was a dual national of sorts. 

Our Target Date – as provided in “Saint Paul’s Joke” – is 2034/5.  That is only twenty years from now … fifteen years from the time whoever is elected in 2016 has their legislation in place.   It will be interesting to see where the Jihad is at that time, and where it stands in 2034/5.  it will also be interesting to see what history says to those who have fought against the interests of so many, so that they could inflict

THE MOST HARM TO THE MOST PEOPLE 

 

PREDICTION 21October 2013

The nation is,going to be,concerned over the possibility of a new SHUTDOWN on 15 January. Therefore, the holiday season purchases will show a marked decline relative to where the state of the economy would suggest.
In effect, the Tea Party has given us,a gift that just keeps on giving.

Greenspan is sympathetic with the Tea Party, so, in accordance with his past inability to see serious problems which are otherwise obvious, we are probably headed for disaster.

Hang in there, it can only get worse - remember, the al-Qaeda war has yet to begin; first they need to solidify their hold in the Middle East; then they attack Rome. The time line could span another decade, possibly two ...in the meantime, the Tea Party must destroy the American economy

Unless the Tea Party can cripple the United States, al-Qaeda cannot hope to advance in Europe. History has repeatedly demonstrated an American reserve force is the savior of Europe. Control the oil, force America to eat its reserves, and, by 2025, they are free to engage Europe ...

ENJOY ... US WWII babies will probably miss,all the fun.

Miscarriage a Terrorist tool implimented in El Salvador, and by “Right to Life” groups

About 65 percent of 1,083 men and women surveyed said they thought miscarriage was rare, when in fact, it occurs in one out of four pregnancies, with Chromosomal abnormalities as the most common cause of miscarriages, accounting for 60 to 80 percent.the researchers said. 

The emotional impact, as reported by 66 percent of those who experienced a miscarriage, is severe and potentially equivalent to losing a child, which is a reality for many people who experience one.

Its is commonly believed that miscarriage was rare, and believed that stressful events or chronic stress were the major causes. These false beliefs often lead to feelings of guilt or blame in parents who experience a miscarriage.

Adding insult to injury are nations like El Salvador, which has one of the toughest anti-abortion laws in the world.  A side-effect of their Fundamentalist approach to abortion is that women who suffer miscarriages are sometimes suspected of inducing an abortion - and can even be jailed for murder.

Thus, assuming that the El Salvadorian medical system is comparable to that of the United States, one in four pregnancies result in miscarriages; among those, the pregnancies which have progressed far enough to be known and identified – which then self-abort through miscarriage – become murders under the law in El Salvador.  Effectively establishing that El Salvador will jail any women who have, or are impregnated by men who have, damaged chromosomes.

Funny – Christian Fundamentalists in America – those you identify as “Right to Life” – want the right to imprison in the same way.  They also want the right – one now forbidden by the Supreme Court – to murder any woman who’s life is endangered by her pregnancy.  Third party murder of total strangers is, and has historically always been, an objective of those who allegedly value human life.

NOTE that these same groups support military action in distant lands – which involves the wholesale murder of people they do not know and who have not committed any crime.

We can look to Syria, and other regions where Jihadist elements are at work, and see the same disregard for innocent lives.  The world is quickly being divided into those who honor the Bible and Koran, and those who claim to represent it – but who, in practice, strive to violate every requirement to protect the innocent and value life.  Their mantras can be reduced to do-good claims which are designed to conceal their evil intent and practices.

 “Saint Paul’s Joke” – are you laughing yet?

   

Ted Cruz begins the next al-Qaeda attack

AMAZING!!!

Ted Cruz, having failed to achieve the goal set down for him by Al-Qaeda — the economic destruction of the American Economy — is deemed “selling the American people down the river.”

The Republicans in House and Senate who voted to avert a Global Recession and allow  America to retain its place as an Economic Superpower, and ensuring that the Dollar remained the world’s reserve Currency, and safe haven is deemed a loss and those who, twelve Days after Ayman al-Zawahiri called for personal attacks on the American economy, did everything they could to fulfill that objective are now  the “Good Guys”.

We can see from Cruz that his alleged “Good Guys” could not “w in a fight w hen [their] own team is firing cannons at the people w ho are standing up and leading, …”

But w here were they leading?

Clearly over an economic cliff.

Let us recall that, high on that list of objectives set down by Osama Bin Laden w as the destruction of the U.S. economy which, he declared in 2004, would be accomplished by “bleeding America to the point of bankruptcy.” DEFAULT on Government Securities is the Internal equivalent of Bankruptcy — and that is precisely w hat Cruz was fighting for.

Now  he castigates those who refused to serve Al-Qaeda, those w ho refused to serve Osama Bin Laden, and refused to obey Ayman al-Zawahiri’s call for personal attacks on the American economy. Ted Cruz obeyed — when he read Dr. Seuss into the House Record, rather than conduct the Nation’s Business as he was charged by his responsibility under his oath as a Senator.

We already know 162 Al-Qaeda operatives in high-ranking positions revealed themselves by their NO VOTE to ending the Shutdown and avoiding Default.  That NO represented a loud YES to bankrupting America and plunging the world into a Global Recession.

Watch the discussion boards – Al-Qaeda operatives cheer those who voted to destroy America.  These operatives, or the dimwits they rely upon to further their objectives, are going to fight to bring the nation down.  They will engage attacks on the White House and any who need a strong humane governmental structure.  They oppose any assistance to those who Jesus commanded be assisted.

Remember, in the Koran, The Prophet Mohammed decreed respect for “The People of the Book” – the Jews, and what is now Israel – he had married a Jewish woman, and would certainly disown any who attacked her family, or anyone else who followed the Old Testament Laws which he mandated his followers follow.   The Prophet, was not unlike Saul of Tarsus [St. Paul – as shown in “Saint Paul’s Joke”] in that regard… both men dictated obedience to the law: teachings of both were subverted to create groups that practiced evil as their religion … both groups killed, rather than educated.

Ted Cruz is part of this pattern of propagating evil.

THE MOST HARM TO THE MOST PEOPLE

Ted Cruz bemoans his latest failure to achieve that goal.

Does Kindness -- the Golden Rule -- Pay?

12:06 PM EDT Friday 18 October 2013

The domestic entitlement policies as sustainable ... but not if America continues to be "policeman to the world". 
Consider the communities which fight to have military bases. Their economies prosper because of it -- with them the economies of the surrounding communities. 
It is based on an economic multiplier -- money introduced circulates in a community seven to ten times before exiting. Each each of the 7-10 steps generates tax revenues (local, state, federal) The federal share, including Social Security contributions, is 2.1 to 3 times the dollars introduced. 
However, if the military base is in a foreign nation -- it literally exports prosperity to foreign nations (post war occupancy of Japan and Germany are nice examples). The drive for a foreign military presence harms the economy and tax rolls ... reverse or reduce that foreign economic footprint and domestic programs are not in jeopardy ... and become fully sustainable. In fact, items like Food Stamps, AFDC and Social Security (now you can add ACA) grow the economy and federal revenues by 2.1-3 dollars for every one outlaid. That is why those who voted to default attack these programs ... they must be destroyed to allow the deficit to increase and the American economy to collapse ... as al-Qaeda has stated was their object. 

We can talk of foreign threats, but any domestic threat, which can be shown to be credible, is best answered by an attack which erases those who fund, or lead it – ideally both.  Warn the innocents to leave their cities, then erase the cities, or capital buildings.  One day, one shot, using drones or ICBM’s – informing the populace first and maybe giving them the option to immediately address the problem elements.

Citizens can side with the terrorists, or permanently remove them.

If they side with them, they die with them.

America no longer needs to have boots on the ground.  It serves no purpose in this modern age – al-Qaeda proved that on 9/11 and when their agents nearly crashed the Global Economy through their actions over the past three weeks.  America also needs to remember, as do those who wish to criticize this approach to the use of the military force, the GOLDEN RULE says, “Do until Others AS they do unto you.”  Another variation says, “Do until Others AS YOU WOULD HAVE them do unto you.”  Together these dictate that you do NOT strike first – unless you want your strike mirrored onto you, so if first, let it be with kindness and love -- but you do strike back – with equal or greater kindness, love, or, in military context, Force and deadly power.

If al-Qaeda strikes, strike back.  If they leave you alone, leave them alone.  If they attack your friends, attack their friends.  If they seek to undermine your economic base, undermine theirs.  If innocents are in region, warn them – they did you no harm, and would, in the future, be obligated to warn you.