Premise: "Syria is known to have extensive supplies of chemical weapons.
Evidence: "UN experts have been in Syria gathering evidence to determine whether chemical weapons attacks have taken place on various occasions. They have now arrived in the Netherlands with samples for analysis.
"The biggest and deadliest apparent attack took place on 21 August in east Damascus. The US says more than 1,400 people were killed."
" Mr Kerry implied that the US evidence was supplied by its own sources, rather than via the UN inspectors.
"In the last 24 hours, we have learned through samples that were provided to the United States that have now been tested from first responders in east Damascus and hair samples and blood samples have tested positive for signatures of Sarin," Kerry said on NBC's Meet The Press."
Problem: Kerry is acting like,a prosecutor who has already gone to trial, rather than one who is examining the evidence to see if a trial is warranted.
Look at the premise... the Sarin exists in storage... therefore it need not have been deployed... only the storage location need be destroyed, or robbed and the stolen goods exploded... both of which point to the rebels, or those,who most profit by the fall of Assad's government... al Qaeda and jihadist types.
Interestingly, British media has begun to assert the benefit of an attack goes to the jihadist movements who are the greatest threat to international peace. The actions of America under Bush have already given them a power base in Iraq and Afghanistan ... now we are talking about giving them Syria.
THE MOST HARM TO THE MOST PEOPLE
It is now the basis of Democratic thought.
World War Three... the Apocalypse ... twenty-two years away and counting down.
SAINT PAUL'S JOKE is in play.